Which makes the whole process rather pointless.Damian-Moderator said:Those behind the all in one bathroom cubicle will not be checked, simply because it is impractical to remove the bathroom
Nick in France said:Which makes the whole process rather pointless.Damian-Moderator said:Those behind the all in one bathroom cubicle will not be checked, simply because it is impractical to remove the bathroom
So the retightening is charged extra ?JTQ said:Not really as it is only a "check" to see if the bolting system needs a retightening; it is not in itself a retightening.
If you look at the unicorn shower you will note the lack of sealing to the base, the shower is not sealed, the walls are in turn screwed to the outer wall, and covered with plastic caps.Nick in France said:Which makes the whole process rather pointless.Damian-Moderator said:Those behind the all in one bathroom cubicle will not be checked, simply because it is impractical to remove the bathroom
Graham Derby said:It sounds to me that Bailey dont have 100% confidence in he van holding together and once again the customer is having to pay for it. £350 in the 3rd year plus a service makes an expencive year.
Afyfe said:There are various techniques used in undustry to prevent nuts/bolts slackening and I can't see any reason not use one of them in this application.
Seems to me to be a money generating scheme or even worse a badly thought out idea.
Not familiar with the Bailey alu tec caravans but it doesn't seem to be a dificult job to check the tighhtnees of a bolt/nut with a torque wrench.
Maybe the nuts/bolts are purposely inaccessible and you need to tear evrything out to get access or maybe there are 10000 of them to check!
Top Cat said:Why is the additional charge £100.00? How long can it take to carry out this check?
It certainly gives the appearance of a money making exercise for the dealer or an extreemly high labour rate for the task. Which I suppose ammounts to the same thing!!!
I would agree that if some [plural] had slackened then it would require a much greater investigation including those behind the shower. I would be very annoyed if anyone treated that work as chargable because in my book anything more than the "check" is a warranty issue.Sir Tainly Barkin said:I guess the thing that worry me would be if during the tightening up some of the fixings were found to be loose, this would by necessity warrant the removal of the shower cubicle to check that fixing – so who would have to pay the extra? The customer presumably.
Well said Top Cat, as long as we are prepared to pay the astronomic prices charged by the leasure industry they will keep doing it.Top Cat said:An interesting point JQT. I must ask a question regarding your last point I quote.
"The bolts are neither difficult to access or to tighten with the exception of those behind the moulded shower wall and there are nothing remotely like “ten thousand” of them; think more of a few tens."
If this is the case, and I have no reason to doubt you, Why is the additional charge £100.00? How long can it take to carry out this check?
It certainly gives the appearance of a money making exercise for the dealer or an extreemly high labour rate for the task. Which I suppose ammounts to the same thing!!!