Hello Gary,
As far as I am aware in 1994, Carver were still selling some re badged or licensed Truma products to parts of the UK market and to some localised foreign markets. It was only later when the wholly UK sourced and manufactured products arrived. I do not have the exact date which is difficult to establish but it was later in the 1990's.- these are unimportant details anyway.
You are correct when you say that the air intakes for all these models were under floor, but there is a significant difference between the safety of an air intake and a flue.
As you have already pointed out the inherent efficiency of combustion of these 1.6kW models resulted in very low levels of CO which barely represented a danger. It was also the the very thermal efficiency of these models that allowed a floor flue to be used in the first case.
The products of combustion were so effectively cooled by the heat exchanger they lost some of their natural positive buoyancy, and that allowed the thermal drive of the flame in the fire way to over come the natural positive buoyancy of the flue product in the later parts of the exchanger and drive the flue gasses out below the horizontal level of the flame. This was Truma's patented feature.
In practice the 1.6kW models of heaters often condensed the water vapour content of the flue and it would be seen either dripping as condensate water and/or emerging as a cloud of water vapour from under the caravan. The larger heat input models (3000 series) could not be so efficient in the space available and hence needed a rood flue.
The following notes are related to very very rare and exceptional circumstances, and due to other safety features the danger to a UK caravanner is absolutely minimal.
With a 1.6kW floor flue the emerging flue gases are initially still lighter than air and will try to rise. This is why with the 1.6kW's underfloor flued products, ventilation holes though the floor must not be located close to the heater. After a short distance the free air movement under the floor will both dilute and cause the flue products to cool.
If there is no free air movement under a caravan such as if a caravan was fully engulfed with snow or other obstructions, (a very rare situation in the UK), then the flue product cannot escape, and will collect and spread under the caravan floor. In addition, the once used flue product will be re ingested into the air intake of the heater, and during re combustion, a higher level of CO will be produced in the flue. If this continues to collect under a caravan, then eventually some will find its way into the caravan through the required low level ventilation holes. This represents a very small danger to the occupants.
This cannot happen in a roof flued product as no flue product is released under the caravan.
The same danger does not apply to the air intake, as the only concern would be unburnt gas. Which is of course dangerous, but a fully functional heater would not be emitting unburnt gas back through its air intake, because if the heater is burning, all the gas will be burnt, and if the flame was not burning, then the Flame failure device would cut the gas supply, so the total volume of unburnt gas will be minimal. This is a far lower risk factor than an under floor flued heater and CO.