Here we step the thin white line. PCv say we can’t bad mouth a “caravan or associated company”.
Most Journals are open minded to freedom of speech. However I will be the first to understand why PCv must be guarded to Libel actions.
Which ? Can say what they want as can most newspapers! Do I care no . If you don’t like the inability to comment on PCv then maybe it’s time we all left. I know it is stifling but it’s their rules.
Sadly though their Journalists like to brain wash us with these immaterial surveys which tell me everything I know.
90% of all European caravan are fitted with the same electrical / gas fittings. They all fail at some point. What does come out is the attitude by certain manufacturers to water ingress issues. We all know on here Bailey and Swift coughed up . Elddis are failing on here and other caravan forums. Maybe cause£ by the triple change of fiscal ownership over the last two years. They can’t all be bad, people buy them. All the U.K. makers carry a massive reserve in their annual financial reports for failures. Why are some, Elddis, being so instransigent?
I f I have over stepped the mark so be it.
Dustydog, Practical Caravan don't allow us to air complaints or grievances about companies on this forum for the very good reason that here we're only ever getting one side of any story.
This prohibition mainly applies to caravan dealerships holiday parks, caravan sites , or individuals associated with them.
Personally, I don't doubt that the details of the disputes or grievances are mostly true, but companies have no automatic right of reply here which, as you stated, could leave us vulnerable to litigation.
Where caravan manufacturers are concerned, it's a well known and obvious fact that sub-standard products have at times been released for sale and criticism of these manufacturers on this forum is legitimate.
There needs to be a massive shift in the attitude of caravan buyers before things will change, and the comments which detail these failings from manufacturers may one day help to bring about a change in perceptions from buyers and better working practices from manufacturers.
No caravan manufacturer is compelled to answer to any caravan forum, but they certainly need to answer to their dealership networks who sell these products and who should ultimately be made to pay under the terms of the CRA.
I've stated this before, we allow caravan related publications to paint a rosy picture within their magazine articles.
We should use the 'Letters to the Editor' platforms, newspaper comments sections and any social media such as Facebook or Twitter which aren't bound by the rules of a caravan forum to challenge the rose tinted viewpoints of caravan journalists and editors.
A caravan forum can become an echo chamber, most of us are aware of the various problems and agree that change is needed, so get scribbling to the wider world, we all know the problems on here. 😉