- Jan 19, 2008
- 9,103
- 0
- 0
I had not thought about the tyre situation cris.
Even tho' I mentioned my friend Mike's incredible 10 to 12 thousand miles only on the front tyres of his Carlton I never thought it through regards the tyre mountain such wear produces.
Given that 60K miles on a set of 4x4 tyres is the norm this would mean about 5 sets of front and probably a back set as well on the Carlton - 12 tyres in all compared to just 4 - Three times the "tyre mountain"!
The cost was about
The bit that is very similar in tone to your intimating that 4x4's are "not good on motorways".Yes we are guests Gio, and I'm not a 4x4 driver. People are surely entitled to debate and offer advice and alternative views!
No fighting, no rudeness, just open opinion without "PC" preaching and scaremongering!
i try to look at the bigger picture, thats why if u read my statement in its full context, u would not use the anti word.The facts as stated re the Carlton are true. They may be an extreme example of a cars tyre wear.
But hey!! - You started the "extreme" quotes with - "large 4x4 are not as safe on m/ways as standard cars".
The opinion of one man and quoted out of context.
The point is that it comes down to personal choice. And if the "Anti's" (Valid description if you constantly criticise those would drive 4x4's) use extremes to get their point across, you can hardly complain if the "Pro's" (Valid description if you feel a 4x4 is best for towing) do the same.
Personally I am delighted you got such a good mileage from your Cavalier. But I wonder if you were the guy that had to be pulled of the wet grass at Sandy Balls last year after his wheel spin caused a lot of damage to the grass surface. He drove a Cavalier and just put his foot down! The Wardens were not impressed and let him know that they did not appreciate having a pitch that needed repair before the next user could get on it!
A similar experience was had by a guy who recently wrote to one of the Land Rover Mags, saying that he was "fed up with getting stuck on wet grass in his Volvo" when caravanning and wanted advice on what LR to buy.
If you just sat back and looked at the bigger picture Gio!
Well me , I don't know what makes some people tick Geordie ;-)
Proof is that larger cars are safer, as you have more around you to protect you from points of impact.
When people quote statistics on certain types of cars having accidents, they should be looking at the drivers of these cars.
Chances are that many would have accidents in what ever they were driving.
People I know who drive 4X4 and other larger cars drive slower than in smaller sportier models of cars. Many larger vehicle drivers say they feel more competent, safer and less intimidated in larger more upright vehicles. This has to be a more positive factor for some.
On motorways etc I like many (I Guess) give large trucks and vans a wide berth. I notice people doing the same with my large cars and vans and at the local schools I've notice over a long period drivers of smaller cars giving the 4x4 and people carriers etc more room.
Seeing a taller vehicle in an area with many pedestrians, has to have positive benefits surely. The fact that it is higher and more easily visible over parked cars and at time moving more cautiously due to being a little wider can also provide positive benefits!
My son and daughter have both driven my cars at times, there style of driving changes for the better when they move out of there "hot hatches" into a the larger two wheel drive cars even now they are use to them.
Friends and aquaintences have commented along the same lines over the years, about people driving "larger" cars.
So when people mention safety I think they should apply a little more latteral thought ;-)
No offense or personal attack here!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cris is right
Bigger cars are safer to the occupants and give a better field of view. I have both the Discovery and an estate car. I love the discovery because it feels safe, sure footed and more relaxed than the estate.
I tow with the discovery because it has a better %age value than the Estate and gives loads of pull when needed.
I for one will not get rid of the discovery regardless of increases in Tax. If it becomes too expensive then the Estate will go and we will use th money it frees up to continue to use the 4x4 to tow with. This will mean that the discovery will also be used for everything else including the school run.
The people who do use 4x4 as status symbols will also continue to use them as they will be more of a symbol of wealth. So all in all, increasing the cost of running a 4x4 by taxing it will result in thee being more on the road, more of the time.
Also, I cannot see how the government can ring fence the 4x4's. any tax increase will have to be on emissions and engine size. This will hit the caravan industry hardest as we are the group of users who have bigger engines than most. Ring fencing 4x4's will be not be allowed as it does not allow free choice and will hit farmers etc. The EU will not allow that.
So, when you start to complain about 4x4's. Please remember that they have the same engine size and emissions as many of the cars we see towing caravans. Do you really want to see our hobby hit so hard? Me, I can afford the tax, but many cannot and that makes me feel sick to the stomach. Sick that because some people do not like what others drive some will have to give up the hobby we all love so much!
Steve
PS, it does not matter what you drive. All that matters is that we are a group of people who love to caravan. Forget the opinions and get out there while you still can afford to