- Nov 19, 2010
- 1,542
- 1
- 0
Can any "techsperts" explain something I don't get?
"Back in the day," bigger engines (in cc terms) were usually more powerful, and cost more because their moving parts were physically bigger.
But now, base vehicles usually have one engine (eg Ford's 2.2, but most of the others work the same way), which is able to produce different power ratings (bhp) depending on how the electronics are set up. And we can pay clever people to "re-map" them, changing the electronic settings to produce more power.
So two questions:
1. If an engine is physically capable of producing more power (which, if driven with a light foot, will help fuel economy instead) WHY would anyone deliberately set it up electronically to produce less?
2. Why are the higher-power options hundreds of pounds more expensive, when it's the same physical components, just adjusted differently?
Am I missing something here?
"Back in the day," bigger engines (in cc terms) were usually more powerful, and cost more because their moving parts were physically bigger.
But now, base vehicles usually have one engine (eg Ford's 2.2, but most of the others work the same way), which is able to produce different power ratings (bhp) depending on how the electronics are set up. And we can pay clever people to "re-map" them, changing the electronic settings to produce more power.
So two questions:
1. If an engine is physically capable of producing more power (which, if driven with a light foot, will help fuel economy instead) WHY would anyone deliberately set it up electronically to produce less?
2. Why are the higher-power options hundreds of pounds more expensive, when it's the same physical components, just adjusted differently?
Am I missing something here?