I think its still early days in regards of driver assist technology and the Insurance Risk Analysists may not have enough data yet to be able to build up a picture if this is a good or bad thing.
Having additional technology in the front of your car may mean that even the slightest 'fender bender' becomes an expensive repair item. Cameras, Lidar, Radar etc may all need replacing. Might this push up premiums.
I also wonder if adding this technology makes those behind the wheel less attentive and that driving skills will deteriorate over time as more dependency occurs. While the driver is supposed to still be in control there may well be additional delays in taking control in a situation where the technology fails to recognise a potential problem. Is it going to miss that cyclist - yes, no, maybe, yes, no too late?
The other debate going on is liability. If an incident occurs that the technology fails to cope with, is the driver resonsible or the company that wrote the rules for the automation?