further to my previous response, I've dug out another post I made on this subject.
while the info might well not what you were hoping to hear, it will save you from a financial disater if your neighbour starts to push things.
Best plan would be some sucking up the neighbour to get him on-side.
Begin Repost:
The point of Restrictive Covenants is that they are designed to do exactly
*that* - to restrict certain specified activities. Breach of such Covenants
does not usually carry a penalty - but, if a Court so rules, the particular
activity must cease, and their is a possibility that damages might be
awarded to the Plaintiff who drew the Court's attention to the infringement.
Although damages are fairly rare in these sort of cases, Costs awarded
against the losing party are not! - and can easily total several thousands
of pounds.
One couple whom I have spoken to purchased a property, knowing that a
Covenant forbade the parking of a caravan there. They, however, owned a
Motorhome - and were confident that they *could* park it on the property,
arguing that it was, in fact, a 'Motor Vehicle' and not a 'caravan'
Three days after moving in, there next door neighbour asked them what they
intended to do about 'That thing' - i.e., the much loved motorcaravan!
The couple replied that they were keeping it on the driveway, that it was a
motor vehicle - and (in effect) that the neighbour could P*ss Off!
So the neighbour did! - and p*ssed off straight to his solicitor!
When the matter came to Court the Judge dismissed the argument that the
motorhome was a 'motor vehicle' (and, in fact, the only source of transport
for the unfortunate couple) and cited the 'Caravan Sites Control Of
Development Act' - which defines a 'caravan' as:
'Any structure designed for human habitation that is capable of being moved
from place to place, either by being towed behind a motor vehicle or being
placed upon any motor vehicle, or any motor vehicle so designed' (I can't
remember the *exact* wording, but that's as near as dammit)
The first part is straightforward - a caravan is a structure designed for
human habitation that's towed behind a car.
The next bit covers 'Static' vans - transported to their destination by
lorry.
It was the last part that stuffed the couple - 'Any motor vehicle so
designed'. Their motor caravan 'was', indeed, a 'motor vehicle' - but is
was designed for human habitation and, thus, was indisputably a 'Caravan'.
And, being a caravan, it was covered by the Covenant in question - and they
had to shift it from the property!
They also had to pay some