Cryptosporidium is very difficult to remove, as has been found by the water company who have this problem, as yet still unresolved.
From looking through various journals on the topic I found this:
"but studies have shown that Cryptosporidium is 240,000 times more resistant to chlorination than Giardia (Jakubowski, 1995), and C. parvum oocyst viability was not affected by exposure to 1.05 and 3% chlorine for up to 18 hours (Korich, et al., 1990). Also, Korich, et al., found that chlorine dioxide and monochloramine were also ineffective in inactivating C. parvum oocysts in drinking water."
Because of the seriousness of this, you would be best advised to contact your regional health authority or water authority treatment technical department.
Regarding filters, the following does not make good reading either:
" If one does not want to boil water constantly, a household water filtration system or drinking bottled water can reduce the risk of Cryptosporidium infection. When selecting a filtration system, the system should have one or all of the following characteristics (Juranek, 1995):
•it can remove particles that are 0.1-1 micrometers in size
•filters water by reverse osmosis
•it has an "absolute" 1-micron filter
•meets NSF standard no. 53 for "cyst removal"
On the other hand, filters that have the following characteristics do NOT guarantee >99% removal of Cryptosporidium oocysts (Juranek, 1995): •filters with a "nominal" 1-micron rating
•only employs ultraviolet light
•uses only activated carbon for filtration
•utilizes pentiodide-impregnated resins
•it is effective against Giardia species "