Glenns comments are very right , you can get rogue cars in any brand.
I happen to disagree with euro because I deal with cars when they breakdown and my knowledge of 20+ years in my job simply says they are no worse than any other brand.
I'm not a landrover fanatic , in fact I would say I'm a Merc nut , and I would have pawned the dog for a Merc. At the momnent my LR fits my needs and does the job I need it to do and reliably.
I've had no faults on 4 LRs in the last 3 or 4 years and know of at least 5 other people who are the same. If that means we're lucky then we're lucky and I'll take that.
Sorry but the breakdown History of LR is one of the worst, especially as it only has a smallish slice of the car market.
A UK associate in a large car hire business looked at LR for his companies hire fleet.
Reliability and Running Costs/Resale Values did not stack up when they scrutinised Disco 3 and RR.
One of our UK associates ran Disco TDI's and then a TD5 all had a string of major failures despite being kept to service schedules.
He gave up 4 years ago and changed to a trouble free Toyota for towing and then a Subaru when they stopped towing. December 2007 he took delivery of a new TD3 to use with a new caravan.
The suspension failed at the dealers on collection, and had to have a hurried reprogramming job. The car was replaced in May 2008 as it had so many problems and had to be trailerd back from near Dijon. The replacement Disco 3 got a bad trade in price against a Merc but after dealing with LR for nearly a year they had had enough.
When the Disco3 was loaded on to the break down vehicle in France the recovery driver said LR caravanners were his favourites as he gets most of his work from them.
But I should add that we do have a friend of UK family who has no trouble with Land Rover relability issues. When his Disco or Range Rover go wrong he just takes another out of stock, and he loves Land Rovers ;0(
At his Florida holiday home he has a BMW.