• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ellie Lawrenson's gran cleared

Copied from another site:

Woman cleared of dog attack death

A woman accused over a fatal dog attack on her granddaughter has been found not guilty of her manslaughter.

Ellie Lawrenson, five, was fatally mauled by a pit bull terrier at Jackie Simpson's home in Knowles House Avenue, St Helens, on New Year's Day.

Ms Simpson, 45, allowed the dog into the house, the jury at Liverpool Crown Court was told.

She denied manslaughter through gross negligence and was found not guilty by the jury on Tuesday.

Ellie suffered 72 injuries in the prolonged attack by her uncle's pit bull, Reuben.

The dog, which had been involved in two other attacks, locked its jaws around the child's throat and shook her.

'Strong emotions'

Hearing the verdict, Ms Simpson wiped her eyes.

Speaking to the jury, the Judge, Mr Justice Royce, said: "This is an unusual case which had given rise to very strong emotions.

"Suffice to say, the greatest sentence passed in this case is a life sentence of regret this lady has passed on herself."

Colin Davies, Assistant District Crown Prosecutor for Merseyside, said the jury had found Ms Simpson's actions did not make her criminally responsible for Ellie's death.

"There is no doubt - and it was accepted by the defence - that Jacqueline Simpson owed a duty of care towards her granddaughter," he said.

"However, the jury by its verdict have accepted that, if there was a breach of her duty of care it was not such that it amounted to a crime.

----

The whole family should have been held responsible for this tragic death.

Lisa
 
According to our local news the grandmother had smoked 10 joints and drank 2 bottles of wine before the incident, beggars belief.
 
She was also taking anti depressants and sleeping tablets.

The dog was regularly kicked and beaten. (Not an excuse by the way) but again, you have to look at the owners.

Lisa
 
This is just one more incident of people not being properly held to account for their actions.

The person concerned was high on a cocktail of drink and legal/illegal drugs, the breed of dog was banned under the 'Dangerous Dogs Act' and was known by the whole family to have been aggressive.

Imagine the difference had the dog belonged to a neighbor and jumped over the fence to commit this incident.

All, including the family concerned I'm sure, would have been calling for justice to be handed down to the owner of the dog.
 
Whilst not condoning the grandmother, she is going to have to carry the loss of her grandaughter & the fall out of her family for the rest of her life (untill her next fix).

Graham W.
 
BARKING:

You say "This is just one more incident of people not being properly held to account for their actions"

I have to disagree with you here. The woman WAS properly held to account in that she was dealt with by the legal process and put on trial. A majority of the jury found her not guilty.

However ......... the matter of whether the verdict was right or wrong is an entirely different thing.

My personal view based on what I see on the BBC news (I have no first hand knowledge of this case) is that she should have been found guilty.

Steve
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Back
Top