In answer to the post made by David who takes issue with the rules of the forum
For a start it's not MY magazine, I don't work for them.
I have no contact with advertisers and so fail to see how I would be in any position to express complaints and grievances, genuine or not, to these companies.
Neither am I in any position to 'moan' at any company.
If you were paying attention you'll observe that I haven't altered the original post in any way, I simply asked the original poster to have a look at forum etiquette so I'm sorry if in your opinion this constitutes a 'big brother mod' approach.
'The customer is ALWAYS right' you say, well maybe the customer should take his complaint up with the company concerned.
By joining this forum our 'customers' agree to abide by the rules of the forum.
The rules of this forum clearly state the position as far as naming companies on the forum is concerned.
Some posters have indeed been positive and I am not here to judge the validity of posts. The positive ones don't compromise forum etiquette.
Nobody was ever sued for praising a service.
For those who wish to completely disregard forum rules and etiquette by naming companies in a way that is potentially litigious when find a caravan internet forum where this is allowed I would respectfully suggest that you use it.
You might not work for the mag, but as a MOD of the forum on the mag website, you must have some contact with them. So although you might not be able to contact the ad men, you will know a man that can....as the saying goes.
Big Brother bit.....you seem more worried about legal action than honest opinions....and for the avoidance of doubt...there is no court in the land that can say your or anyones opinion is wrong....they might not agree, but the cannot say it is wrong.
The second last paragraph.....last line.....so if we post a negative comment we / the mag will get sued...is that what you are saying.....
Mmmm....I am amember of 14 forums and they all allow negative feedback in posts.....if the posts are Racist, Sexist, etc etc, they are deleted and correctly so.....but if they are opinion based they are left alone..
If Paul had posted something like....
"Thankyou very much Haven Holidays but you are miserably less than I expected. Your publicity is a factually incorrect in my opinion".....
would that have been OK.
Different words....same message.......
As I said......"To moan at the poster of a topic and not to do so to the company is, IMO, disgraceful"
Cheers......