I can't see any logical benefit of fitting a valve that has a higher pressure rating than the valve that has the correct one for the given tyre.
On the face of it a logical enough conclusion, but what in this case it can miss is that the stem construction adopted can be totally different and very relevant.
"Standard" stems are a polymer "rubber" with a brass threaded valve holder moulded into the "top". Here the captive bit in the rim is 100% polymer as is much of the stem; you can flex the stem. And that does happen, the more so with longer stems and where TyrePal sensors add mass to the end. Plus the polymers used can perish and that is not cosmetic as it is polymer holding the air in. Hopefully they get replaced long before the 6 to 7 years caravan tyres can stay in place.
Turn now to the HP stems used by commercials like Transits; there you will find the body throughout is a brass tube with a flange, and coated in a polymer to achieve a seal and retaining collar on the rim. These being metal don't flex, nor does the polymer that is holding the air in, the only vital bit here in the rim, perish, it can't see UV or flex.
My caravan tyres are inflated to 65 psi and run frequently, touring France, at 77 psi, and I have had two standard valve stem failures, both at walking pace thankfully. These were long shank stems and I was using TyrePal, both failed close to three years after new tyres, and both were seriously perished and cracked in the root.
I would never ever again accept a standard valve stem on any caravan I own, and thankfully have none on our Disco car, all are metal.
I think they cost me about £3 each, the cost of the failure was many times more and came with lots of totally unwanted hassle.