What do forum members think will happen to the UK caravan manufacturing industry now we are leaving the EU?
you might want to [if you haven't already] take the time and look up how complex trade deals are with differing nations ,and the fact everybody wants them on their own terms . I believe we even need to join the WTO world trade organisation and as of yet we don't even have a say on that.. "favourable terms" i suppose we can all dream of past glory years!Parksy said:With any luck our caravan industry will be able to expand their world market on more favourable terms than would otherwise have been the case. The August edition of PCv magazine (Showroom News page 63) has mentioned that major British caravan manufacturers are already looking at the possibilities of export to an expanding Chinese market, and Coachman already supplies caravans which are being bought by a developing recently affluent Chinese middle class.
Things should be looking up for most British manufacturing industries after the dust has settled, with a strong possibility of less regulation and the ability to negotiate our own trade deals on our own terms with any country that chooses to buy our products.
Parksy said:Coachman already supplies caravans which are being bought by a developing recently affluent Chinese middle class.
.
JonnyG said:you might want to [if you haven't already] take the time and look up how complex trade deals are with differing nations ,and the fact everybody wants them on their own terms . I believe we even need to join the WTO world trade organisation and as of yet we don't even have a say on that.. "favourable terms" i suppose we can all dream of past glory years!Parksy said:With any luck our caravan industry will be able to expand their world market on more favourable terms than would otherwise have been the case. The August edition of PCv magazine (Showroom News page 63) has mentioned that major British caravan manufacturers are already looking at the possibilities of export to an expanding Chinese market, and Coachman already supplies caravans which are being bought by a developing recently affluent Chinese middle class.
Things should be looking up for most British manufacturing industries after the dust has settled, with a strong possibility of less regulation and the ability to negotiate our own trade deals on our own terms with any country that chooses to buy our products.
don't believe everything you read on the internet news lines . just over 5 in 10 people wanted out here clearly no landslide there are other small parties in other countries also questioning things..but given the closeness of our referendum and the famous words of de gaulle we the UK are not Europeans and should never be allowed to join.. so any comparison to what has happened here and any other large EU nation following suit is wishful thinking by the tabloids .Dustydog said:Well done United Kingdom. We had the guts to have a referendum and we are now standing up and being counted.
The rest of Europe, some so far, are asking lots of questions and Italy want a referendum to bin the Euro , introduce a new currency or a Euro2.
France are on strike today as Mdme Le Pen wants France out and so does Sweden and Denmark. Germany is no longer sure.
Herr Kerber of the German CBI, insists all the German car makers will still sell to us with no penalties. He says Airbus will still buy wings , landing gear and jet engines from us.
We'll if they don't they will ruin their own industries.
Steve.
We are very happy dogs here in Wiltshire B)
Mel said:No idea how the Caravan or any other industry will fare. Me, I can't wait until the 350 million quid a week starts flowing into the NHS.....
What do you mean Farage said today that this claim was a " mistake". Surely no-one has lied!
Mel
It was a mistake by the official Brexit camp to claim that £350 million will flow into the NHS, but the mistake was not made by Farage because he was never part of the official Brexit campaign. They were the ones who had mentioned the £350 million for the NHS. The claim was actually on the exterior of the official campaign bus, not Nigel's rickety old open topped char-a-bang. Of course Cameron and his cronies always told the absolute truth in their efforts to get us to give away our democratic freedoms......... didn't they?Mel said:No idea how the Caravan or any other industry will fare. Me, I can't wait until the 350 million quid a week starts flowing into the NHS.....
What do you mean Farage said today that this claim was a " mistake". Surely no-one has lied!
Mel
I do hope they have otherwise I'm off to find my tin hat ready for the start of WW3 as predicted by the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.Mel said:No idea how the Caravan or any other industry will fare. Me, I can't wait until the 350 million quid a week starts flowing into the NHS.....
What do you mean Farage said today that this claim was a " mistake". Surely no-one has lied!
Mel
hi parsky, you are correct they are of doom an gloom, find it a good place to start then things can only get better. my remark about the car industry of the 60's looking forward to the 70s , and not about the 70s was made to highlight the "we are alright mentality" of inward thinking that so often comes back to bite you. again why not learn from history instead of dismiss it. which bring me back to your earlier post and the Marshall plan. ive slept on it truthfully didn't see what that had to do with the EU debate . but taking it as a view of how we were hard done by i'd say its all about where you begin your argument? you begin it at the Marshall plan and i'd begin it at the treaty of Versailles. acknowledged universally as being a treaty so Harsh it fundamentally led to the rise of Nazism and to WW2 .. the Marshall plan as you know was a plan to stop that happening again, besides it made economical sense to the yanks . and of course our lend lease deal was with the Yanks too, so hardly know what that had to do with the EU.. unless you are suggesting no aid should have been offered?maybeyour argument is Something we should have taken up with the Americans.? oh and the link below is how OUR government preventing the Eu from saving OUR steel industry just a few months back.Parksy said:It was a mistake by the official Brexit camp to claim that £350 million will flow into the NHS, but the mistake was not made by Farage because he was never part of the official Brexit campaign. They were the ones who had mentioned the £350 million for the NHS. The claim was actually on the exterior of the official campaign bus, not Nigel's rickety old open topped char-a-bang. Of course Cameron and his cronies always told the absolute truth in their efforts to get us to give away our democratic freedoms......... didn't they?Mel said:No idea how the Caravan or any other industry will fare. Me, I can't wait until the 350 million quid a week starts flowing into the NHS.....
What do you mean Farage said today that this claim was a " mistake". Surely no-one has lied!
Mel
Jonny G
Your comments consist mainly of doom and gloom conjecture on what could happen now that we've left the EU.
Nobody is in a position to know what will happen so we shall see.
I sincerely hope that whichever side individuals supported and voted, for we can now unite as one self-governing nation to seek our destiny and prosperity together.
The Civil Service are the officials who have massive input on trade agreements in any free country, which is what we have once again become.
The civil service has many legal experts to help to define what is possible and what is allowed by law, Government ministers read the draft proposals and if there is cabinet agreement the minister rubber stamps the completed proposals to be mutually agreed by both sides. The other parties will also have draft proposals submitted by their own civil service for ministerial approval.
Whatever had been written in a book about the 1970s car industry may have had some relevance then, but it certainly has no relevance now because we have no British car industry to speak of.
We do have what remains of a steel industry however, but EU law prevented our Westminster government from offering financial assistance to preserve it and to safeguard British jobs but hopefully this situation will now change rapidly.
Our caravan industry is a success story (despite the various caravan forum posts which have serious complaints which should rightfully be addressed by the industry) and if they manage to export their products worldwide on terms favourable to their continued growth, good luck to them.
I'm not prepared to debate the outcome of the referendum.
People were given a vote on an issue of vital national importance and the result was that the majority wanted to leave the EU so that's what is happening, like it or not.
The issue is beyond debate, it is decided.
Many have voiced their displeasure with regard to the result of the referendum via social media, and I've no wish as one who wished to preserve some semblance of democracy for Britain to gloat in any way, but almost everyone that I count as family or friend is overjoyed at the result.
I'm not a pessimist, I prefer to look at the things that should go right rather than to worry about things that could go wrong, because neither of us is in any position to alter the current situation so why lose any sleep over it? Que Sera Sera :lol:
P.S. I'm actively participating in this discussion, so therefore I wouldn't dream suddenly coming over all Moddy and deleting any comment from anyone whatever their views on the referendum result may be.
We're all adults, we are usually polite, friendly, tolerant and respectful of each others opinions. Many of us will have held strong views on our continued membership of the EU for some time and it's only natural for people to wish to express these views.
As long as we don't personally abuse each other I see no problem in the light of such a momentous national historical event.
WoodlandsCamper said:I HATE politics. The OP started the thread about the effects on the caravan industry, but it has gone the expected way - the emotional thoughts of the Remain/Exit polarization. HELP. :evil:
me too... so on the caravan thing, its good right if we can export more of whatever its good... now china there must be a huge potential market out there. but here i go i fear as someone has alredy started they will merely steal the template to decent caravan building and rip off the idea.but we should still be able to tap into there market regardless of copycats stealing our ideas from us..WoodlandsCamper said:I HATE politics. The OP started the thread about the effects on the caravan industry, but it has gone the expected way - the emotional thoughts of the Remain/Exit polarization. HELP. :evil:
Parksy said:Don't read it then
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ocking-eu-plans-to-allow-a6962446.html[/quoteJonnyG said:hi parsky, you are correct they are of doom an gloom, find it a good place to start then things can only get better. my remark about the car industry of the 60's looking forward to the 70s , and not about the 70s was made to highlight the "we are alright mentality" of inward thinking that so often comes back to bite you. again why not learn from history instead of dismiss it. which bring me back to your earlier post and the Marshall plan. ive slept on it truthfully didn't see what that had to do with the EU debate . but taking it as a view of how we were hard done by i'd say its all about where you begin your argument? you begin it at the Marshall plan and i'd begin it at the treaty of Versailles. acknowledged universally as being a treaty so Harsh it fundamentally led to the rise of Nazism and to WW2 .. the Marshall plan as you know was a plan to stop that happening again, besides it made economical sense to the yanks . and of course our lend lease deal was with the Yanks too, so hardly know what that had to do with the EU.. unless you are suggesting no aid should have been offered?maybeyour argument is Something we should have taken up with the Americans.? oh and the link below is how OUR government preventing the Eu from saving OUR steel industry just a few months back.
now i'm told i've a doom and gloom type of response OK i accept that but we all have our own perspectives of how we look at things, and that mean we can all look for positives of our view points and the negatives of others. straight away some myths... The EU has only been responsible for 13% of our laws the way some go on you'd think they made all the laws and besides what makes them all bad? my remark concerning civil servants was to point out they make far far more Amendments to our laws and apparently our MPs haven't found a way to stop them i find that strange. oh the link is our steel industry how the EU tried to help and our government didnt!!
]http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tata-steel-uk-government-accused-of-failing-to-protect-british-workers-by-blocking-eu-plans-to-allow-a6962446.html
WoodlandsCamper said:Parksy said:Don't read it then
If I don't read it then how do I know you've told me not to read it?
thank you , of course not that i can entirely agree on many of the things you state but indeed everything is measured and viewed from differing stand points , i mean our rail network like so many failings we have is in part due to us or our governments that we vote for. Also Mussolini? not even going to go there apart from my 2 sets of grandparents view him differently one being from the north of Italy the others from the south!..north south divide and all ... but interestingly this discussion had me thinking and checking just how much data is available from news feed and internet searches that only reports negativity of the EU its far more difficult to find positive,not because there isnt any info, the negative stuff is repeated in such large numbers as to hide the good stuff,but you could say that about almost anything...but can i make one correction..we have not left the EU our intention is to invoke article 50 ,as yet that has not happened nor is it likely for 3 months,this in itself i find strange . as the rumblings continue all over these great isles.. as i am sure you are aware a referendum does not have any legal status and this has been reported by all news feed it takes an act of parliament to change law .although i believe something was indeed done in 2015 to change that, for this referendum , not found any news reports to confirm this either. one last thing "Parliament privilege" not for one moment do i foresee this happening but a challenge could be entered using "Parliament privilege" given apparently 70% of MPs are for staying and we are into some incredible times, Scotland trying for another referendum ,i'm still struggling to get to grips that they actually had one..London the powerhouse of Great Britain not at all happy even Cameroon resigning .ok not a fan but he is the PM ? yes times are changing and frankly anybody merely thinking well we have had a referendum thats it ,umm lets hope so .. but then isn't that what was said after the last referendum back in 1975? and that wasnt the last word ,dont think this is either if you actually look at whats happening...Parksy said:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ocking-eu-plans-to-allow-a6962446.html[/quoteJonnyG said:hi parsky, you are correct they are of doom an gloom, find it a good place to start then things can only get better. my remark about the car industry of the 60's looking forward to the 70s , and not about the 70s was made to highlight the "we are alright mentality" of inward thinking that so often comes back to bite you. again why not learn from history instead of dismiss it. which bring me back to your earlier post and the Marshall plan. ive slept on it truthfully didn't see what that had to do with the EU debate . but taking it as a view of how we were hard done by i'd say its all about where you begin your argument? you begin it at the Marshall plan and i'd begin it at the treaty of Versailles. acknowledged universally as being a treaty so Harsh it fundamentally led to the rise of Nazism and to WW2 .. the Marshall plan as you know was a plan to stop that happening again, besides it made economical sense to the yanks . and of course our lend lease deal was with the Yanks too, so hardly know what that had to do with the EU.. unless you are suggesting no aid should have been offered?maybeyour argument is Something we should have taken up with the Americans.? oh and the link below is how OUR government preventing the Eu from saving OUR steel industry just a few months back.
now i'm told i've a doom and gloom type of response OK i accept that but we all have our own perspectives of how we look at things, and that mean we can all look for positives of our view points and the negatives of others. straight away some myths... The EU has only been responsible for 13% of our laws the way some go on you'd think they made all the laws and besides what makes them all bad? my remark concerning civil servants was to point out they make far far more Amendments to our laws and apparently our MPs haven't found a way to stop them i find that strange. oh the link is our steel industry how the EU tried to help and our government didnt!!
]http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tata-steel-uk-government-accused-of-failing-to-protect-british-workers-by-blocking-eu-plans-to-allow-a6962446.html
I never implied that we were 'hard done by' as the result of the Marshall Plan or our Lend Lease repayments Jonny.
If you had understood the point that I was trying to make it was that there was never a golden era that you mentioned for British Industry because the investment funds needed to compete effectively were unavailable for the reasons that I stated but European manufacturing industry, which had been pretty much destroyed during world war 2 had to start again from nothing.
The Marshall Plan quite rightly ensured that the funds were available to significant investment in modern machinery and equipment to happen and the proof is there for all to see.
Compare the efficient modern French or German rail system to our outdated rail infrastructure.
I'm not suggesting that no aid should have been offered, it was exactly the right thing to do and to my mind it did more to ensure European peace and stability than the cumbersome remote EU could ever hope to achieve.
I'd agree that the reparations demanded by the Treaty of Versailles was in part responsible for the rise of the Nazis in Germany, but Italy was a Fascist Axis country that had fought against Germany in World War 1.
The rise of Italian Fascism was said to be fuelled by a sense of injustice and resentment, so Mussolini threw in his lot with Hitler.
For every different news publication there will be a different slant on who did what and why so I rarely bother with newspaper articles.
The fact remains that as a nation we have left the EU and to succeed for the future we must unite to prosper, the die is cast so no amount of moaning will change it.