why was the topic regarding government expenditure locked? Having read the whole thread, i could find nothing inflammatory. Indeed there was a very interesting debate taking place involving caravaners whose liveleyhoods , lives and holidays could be affected by the political and economic issues we are all facing today.
I frequent many different forums, from R/C to Music and Theatre, and of all the forums (some privately owned, others not) this forum appears to very quickly stifle some debats.
A forum is a by its very nature a place for debate.Threads often develop , change direction and evolve , but thats what threads do, and is certainly not a reason to lock them.
The word forum means exactly that, in latin it translates as " market place" and was an open, public area where people could meet to dicuss and debate current topics.
I fully appreciate the need for moderation , however it must be fair and should only occur wherewhen tempers get inflamed and there was no sign of this.
Moderation is the function of abitration and concilliation , and is not censorship.
Those forums that have allowed debates to evolve , and have actively encouraged the exchange of ideas, have seen large growth in memberships, that add to the whole mix of ideas and information thats available.
Moderation is quite a skill. Knowing when to step in to diffuse a situation, orperhaps editing posts is an art( lots of forums usually email the poster advising them of what they are doing and why). Locking threads should be a last resort, as you never know , the thread may take an unexpected turn and throw up intersting and possibly highly relevant facts for those interested in the debate.
I
I frequent many different forums, from R/C to Music and Theatre, and of all the forums (some privately owned, others not) this forum appears to very quickly stifle some debats.
A forum is a by its very nature a place for debate.Threads often develop , change direction and evolve , but thats what threads do, and is certainly not a reason to lock them.
The word forum means exactly that, in latin it translates as " market place" and was an open, public area where people could meet to dicuss and debate current topics.
I fully appreciate the need for moderation , however it must be fair and should only occur wherewhen tempers get inflamed and there was no sign of this.
Moderation is the function of abitration and concilliation , and is not censorship.
Those forums that have allowed debates to evolve , and have actively encouraged the exchange of ideas, have seen large growth in memberships, that add to the whole mix of ideas and information thats available.
Moderation is quite a skill. Knowing when to step in to diffuse a situation, orperhaps editing posts is an art( lots of forums usually email the poster advising them of what they are doing and why). Locking threads should be a last resort, as you never know , the thread may take an unexpected turn and throw up intersting and possibly highly relevant facts for those interested in the debate.
I