Dustydog:
Well I made an error in assuming that the "Twin" was the four-wheel drive unit; my "half torque" comment [at the roller/tyre] was about movers driving on both axles, sorry.
The same higher geared drive unit is also supplied as the "heavy duty 3" for the single axle market but here fitted with a smaller roller that further increases its overall gearing. My single axle van is up at twin axle weights, being 1900kg. I had a dialog with them because of its weight and the recommendation was to have the smaller roller version. I never did understand why in the twin axle case they fit a larger roller.
The original units I was supplied with had cast alloy rollers with "spikes" but the replacement for some reason had cast large "diamond knurl" surface. I feel the spikes might have given better wet traction than the smoother surfaced diamonds.
Mine never gets any "wheel-spin", but gets a lot of roller to tyre slip in wet conditions. The smooth diamond knurl does not leave any visual witness on the tyre after slipping. Never got to try the spiked rollers in the wet.
I can see with a twin axle van with drive to a single axle it could more easily encounter wheel spin. And I can see that for the same weight the twin axle could roll easier on soft ground.[in straight line anyway]
Lutz's Truma unit with its big castellated pattern might present too smooth a surface to be good in the wet. Wet rubber against metal has zilch friction [used in marine shaft bearings] , so any drive must be through its ability to deform the rubber.
As I said in an earlier posting I am interested in how well this type of roller actually performs in the wet, Lutz's experience is suggesting no better than my diamond knurl.
Cheers JTQ