PS
As we have so many lame Duck politicians, could Bird Flu be heading for that nice old building next the Thames ;-)
As we have so many lame Duck politicians, could Bird Flu be heading for that nice old building next the Thames ;-)
And the 4 x 4 will be safer in bad weather and icy conditions and be able to offer assitance to others as many of my 4X4 friends find when Ice and Snow strikes.In the same issue of the C&CC magazine is a letter from a member regarding 4x4s and I quote:
"I see that the army of dogooders is at it again. Now they want to raise the VAT on 4x4s. Let me put my case,
We ahve a Suzuki Grand Vitara. It is no longer than a normal family saloon and not much heavier. It has big wheels and great broad tyres so that its pressure on the road is minimised.
It has selectable four wheel drive (no central differential), so it is only used in that mode to shift our caravan about the site, where it maintains the integrity of the grass surface because it does not slip. It is comfortable at 70mph on the motorway so we keep it at that, and it does 34mpg. We do no more than 8000 miles per year.
So can someone please give me a reasonable explanation as to why I should pay more VAT than someone with, say, a souped up saloon, over powered hot hatchback or sports car?
But here's a fact, a car designed to run in permanent 4 wheel drive will always do less damage to road surface than a similar one pulling in two"
End of qoute.
I think that the writer has made some valid points regarding 2 and 4 wheel drive vehicles whether they be cars or 4x4 off roaders. I used my Daihatsu Fourtrack yesterday to visit Abergavenny and over approx 100 mile return trip I was always in 2 wheel drive and averaged 35mpg. My son with a 1.8 litre MG ZS claims he can just about average 25 - 28mpg with normal driving. Which therefore is the more user friendly?