Rear wheel drive

Mar 19, 2007
348
0
0
Visit site
Very little difference. With a rear wheel drive you increase traction on the drive wheels with the load on the towball but it reduces the traction on the front wheel. Whilst thsi is unlikely to be noticed on the road except on a steep hill start, it can be most noticeable on wet grass.

Overall I have noticed very little difference when I changed from rear to front wheel drive.

Alan
 
Jul 31, 2006
417
0
0
Visit site
Stephen,

999 people out of 1000 would'nt notice the difference, its only in really adverse conditions that you do.

BMW's make nice tow cars especially the diesel 3 & 5 series
 
Sep 13, 2006
1,411
0
0
Visit site
On a wet or muddy field is where the difference would be noticed.

My own experience with FWD is that when the car loses grip it is more likely that the front end will slide around "polishing" the grass, the wetter it is the more likely it will dig in.

From watching RWDs in similar situations, they will have more grip but are more likely to dig in.

Whichever I had in those circumstances I would probably seek help from a 4WD and that has happened once in 3 years and c.50 rallies and CLs in all weathers and with more than half of them green field.

We had a Shogun for a while but the extra running costs were not really justified for the amount of times we needed 4WD - and the Alhambra we have now is a far better and more comfortable tow car on the road.
 
Mar 14, 2005
3,157
0
0
Visit site
Once again, there is little difference, both will slip without due care. However, ask yourself, muddy field, car parked alongside the caravan or attached to it, waiting to move off, which wheels are close to the tarmac road and hence safety?
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts