- Mar 14, 2005
- 18,654
- 3,918
- 50,935
I welcome the new forum format with its instant on-line functionality, however there are a few niggles that may just be my own Luddite preferences but may be worth further discussion.
On the opening page (generic headings such as Technical, Sites etc) the continual re-sequencing of the order in response to the latest posting is disorientating. As there are a distinctly limited number of headings on this page surely a fixed sequence would be preferable. It is surely not necessary or helpful to know who the last person was who made a submission on this page.
It is also disorientating to find that a thread will appear at the top of the section page with the name of the latest respondent against it. If like me you like to watch how a particular issue is developing, you tend to recognise the subject and the original poster. I would suggest that the name of the originator is retained on the index page.
I am not sure why you differentiate between a reply to a topic and a comment. Surely both are fundamentally the same. The replies are shown fully listed whilst the comments are truncated. To view the comment you have to request, and the page goes back to the top of this listing, and you then have to work your way down. IF a thread is becoming very long (remember "would you buy a caravan that wasn't white?) this becomes very tedious and it is easy to loose track of your position.
When logging on, Most web sites will recognise the use of the "return/Enter" key at the end of a password as "submit" Can your site adopt the same convention?
Whilst it has not happened yet it is possible that two separate threads may be started that have the same title.
With the instant response, how do you now moderate inappropriate responses, or do you rely on the good behaviour of the assemble hoards?
On the opening page (generic headings such as Technical, Sites etc) the continual re-sequencing of the order in response to the latest posting is disorientating. As there are a distinctly limited number of headings on this page surely a fixed sequence would be preferable. It is surely not necessary or helpful to know who the last person was who made a submission on this page.
It is also disorientating to find that a thread will appear at the top of the section page with the name of the latest respondent against it. If like me you like to watch how a particular issue is developing, you tend to recognise the subject and the original poster. I would suggest that the name of the originator is retained on the index page.
I am not sure why you differentiate between a reply to a topic and a comment. Surely both are fundamentally the same. The replies are shown fully listed whilst the comments are truncated. To view the comment you have to request, and the page goes back to the top of this listing, and you then have to work your way down. IF a thread is becoming very long (remember "would you buy a caravan that wasn't white?) this becomes very tedious and it is easy to loose track of your position.
When logging on, Most web sites will recognise the use of the "return/Enter" key at the end of a password as "submit" Can your site adopt the same convention?
Whilst it has not happened yet it is possible that two separate threads may be started that have the same title.
With the instant response, how do you now moderate inappropriate responses, or do you rely on the good behaviour of the assemble hoards?