I personally favour the hose a float valve in an water barrel solution. If the hose or valve does fail does fail you wont get damaged pipework or appliances or a flooded caravan, and the barrel means you wont suffer variable pressure or flows from the site tap.
That is not true.... neither is safer than the other.
Failure of the pressure reducer will only cause damage if the site water pressure is high - most sites I've been to, the site pressure is lower than an external submersible pump!That is not true.
It's a question of potential risk.
Provide everything is working correctly then there is no problem, but risk is if the pressure reducer in the hose pipe fails ( as a few have done) the mains water pressure WILL damage pipe work or appliances and cause a flood.
By comparison if a submersible pump continues to run the maximum pressure it will produce will still be under the pressure limits for the system so it wont blow fittings or flood.
Diaphragm pumps that continue to run can develop more pressure and might damage pipework and appliances. but the rate of such failures is very low indeed.
Of course anything that can damage the internal pipe work might cause a flood but the question was about the mains water connection system fittings not the internal pipework.
Failure of the pressure reducer will only cause damage if the site water pressure is high - most sites I've been to, the site pressure is lower than an external submersible pump!
Bear in mind the OP specifically asked for notice of any problems with these devices.I've never heard of one of these failing ( but every thing can and does)
Wow With your vast experience prof and undoubted knowledge 10 failures seems a v small number and makes me glad we have one. Bear in mind the op can read our posts and make their own minds up and I was offering a solution to the issues you posed. I didn't need your advice on how to respond to a question but am of course always interested in your pov nor did I disagree . Trying to be positive about a device that has improved our caravan experience. I'd rather the moderators moderate my post if my advice were to be incorrect .Bear in mind the OP specifically asked for notice of any problems with these devices.
By the time I left the industry at the turn of the century, I was aware of about 10 (of different makes) of these mains water pressure regulators that had failed resulting in flood damage to caravans. Now that's very small percentage of the these systems actually sold, but the cost of in both monetary and sheer inconvenience is dramatically greater than the costs associated with the alternative pump failures.
Jezzer B hasn't experienced a failure so he has as much right to share his experience as anybody else Prof.Bear in mind the OP specifically asked for notice of any problems with these devices.
Of course he has,Jezzer B hasn't experienced a failure so he has as much right to share his experience as anybody else Prof.
May I ask, of the ten or so failures attributed to the pressure control device, was each suspect valve actually examined and a failure of the valve verified?Of course he has,
I was attempting to show that whilst the No's of failure I was aware of ( and of course there could be several more by now) the numbers are very small but the consequences do are much worse than a pump failure.
Of the few I personally saw, there was no doubt that the hoses were passing unregulated mains pressure to the caravans, and the damage to the caravan was consistent with excess pressure and flow exceeding the water heaters pressure relief valve capacity to dump water. We learned of similar cases with involving other manufacturers products.May I ask, of the ten or so failures attributed to the pressure control device, was each suspect valve actually examined and a failure of the valve verified?
"the incidence is probably very low, but the consequences are major. But it is a risk and as such is relevant to the OP's question."
We gave up on switching off the water tap as most times forgot anyway. We make sure that we check the pressure at the water tap and adjust it accordingly.Totally agree-very relevant and it's clearly an added risk, but much reduced if like us you simply switch off the tap at the mains on the bollard when you leave the caravan. Good practice anyway imo as the joins/tap very often drip and waste water.
We make sure that we check the pressure at the water tap and adjust it accordingly.
Ah well it makes me feel better and less water will be emittedc if it did happen!
Blimey professor waterman, that sounds too complicated for me. I will continue to open the tap just a little bit which to my simple way of thinking will keep pressure to the caravan down.A tap can't adjust the achieved downstream static water pressure, only a dynamic pressure, one that is unique for any set flow rate.
Pressure, be that dynamic or static, is what can over pressurise systems.
Adjusting the site supply tap's opening yields absolutely zilch over pressure protection, unless your system itself leaks adequately to dump your selected flow rate.
Adjusting the supply tap's setting brings some user advantages, but ultimately over pressurisation protection, is not one of them.
Unfortunately, the same laws in hydrostatics comes into play with any pressure regulating valve, any weep across it ultimately inflicts the same static pressure downstream as upstream, controlled only by the downstream system's ability to leak off that weeping flow.
Hence, on any fluid system, water fuel etc on significant capital value projects, we integrate some form of "relief" downstream of pressure regulators.
But it doesn't keep the pressure down, all you are doing is restricting the flow when the caravan is taking water. JTQ is exactly right.Blimey professor waterman, that sounds too complicated for me. I will continue to open the tap just a little bit which to my simple way of thinking will keep pressure to the caravan down.