the police are not obliged to give you any allowance at all. your speedo will be inaccurate by upto 10% but it will always be enthusiastically inacccurate, it will never read under. if it does you'll be charged with that too.
No the accident happened because the speed limit signs flashed up a lower speed and the front car drive hit the brakes really hard, the car alongside panicked and then mayhem.Philspadders said:Michaell- No they dont. If they clock you doing 71 the chances are your speedo is reading 76/77, not 66/67.
Sadie wrote
We're not big users of the M42, going to last years Autosport show the speed changed in morning traffic and a few cars in front of us there was a multiple crash, sombody braked for the reduced limit and four or five cars tail ended one another.
Thats not the speed limit , thats pratts driving too close to each other.
I drive around 600 miles per week, motorway, urban and rural. I Use the M42, especially the northbound stretch where vehciles over 7.5t are restricted to the nearside lane , and in this section the traffic flows much better.
As for the M25 , when i first used it many years ago it was bad, but at least once a week i *** down to Farnham from Sheffield and now find the M25 quiet easy , especially with the variable speed limits.
The biggest problem with the M25 are drivers hoping junctions, mums on school runs that sort of thing.
So the accident was down to poor driver/s skills, and not the variable speed limits ? after all if everyone drive according to the highway code there would have been plenty of time for everyone to slow down 20 or 30 mph, without incident.Shady Sadie said:No the accident happened because the speed limit signs flashed up a lower speed and the front car drive hit the brakes really hard, the car alongside panicked and then mayhem.Philspadders said:Michaell- No they dont. If they clock you doing 71 the chances are your speedo is reading 76/77, not 66/67.
Sadie wrote
We're not big users of the M42, going to last years Autosport show the speed changed in morning traffic and a few cars in front of us there was a multiple crash, sombody braked for the reduced limit and four or five cars tail ended one another.
Thats not the speed limit , thats pratts driving too close to each other.
I drive around 600 miles per week, motorway, urban and rural. I Use the M42, especially the northbound stretch where vehciles over 7.5t are restricted to the nearside lane , and in this section the traffic flows much better.
As for the M25 , when i first used it many years ago it was bad, but at least once a week i *** down to Farnham from Sheffield and now find the M25 quiet easy , especially with the variable speed limits.
The biggest problem with the M25 are drivers hoping junctions, mums on school runs that sort of thing.
I've not seen sign of many school run mums on the M25. And between M25 junctions witch routes do you suggest we use?
For a start, say Wisley/Cobham to St Peters Hospital Chetsey. 30 + minutes by A road or 10 by M25
any excuse to speedEssexeddie said:Last summer whilst joining the M4 from Somerset towing the van at a steady 55mph, the lorry next to me lost a front wheel and was bouncing up and down and gaining speed just a few feet away from me. I was glad that I had the power to excellerate to 85MPH to get away from the danger. If I didn't speed I wouldn't be here now.
So it does have its uses!
.
any excuse to speedEssexeddie said:
JonnyG said:It was meant as humour eddie, but on a more serious note hardly think a combi could accelerate that quickly from 56 to 85 mph! indeed Once you had accelerated from 56 to say just 70 mph you would already have cleared a vehicle, if indeed he was by your side. so I do not understand the real need to carry on speeding all the way to 85mph.Essexeddie said:
No i have never had the pleasure of towing with one of those land cruisers, but hear good things about them.....Essexeddie said:no never towed with one, but have herd very good things about those land cruiserJonnyG said:It was meant as humour eddie, but on a more serious note hardly think a combi could accelerate that quickly from 56 to 85 mph! indeed Once you had accelerated from 56 to say just 70 mph you would already have cleared a vehicle, if indeed he was by your side. so I do not understand the real need to carry on speeding all the way to 85mph.Essexeddie said:
Well, if you could see this very large lorrie wheel bouncing up and down higher than my van and GAINING speed I think you would have done the same if you were there. I just wanted to get away from there as fast as I could. I slowed down at 85 as I could see in my mirrors that I had cleared the area, and all I could see in the distance was dust. No other vehicles past me for at least 5 miles so God knows what happened.
Oh! I take it you have never towed with a Landcruiser
.