- Mar 14, 2005
- 18,444
- 3,728
- 50,935
We only have one side of the story from the complainant. The way he has reported it is not entirely clear, and unfortunately we have no way of establishing the accuracy or truth of the situation. Some very good general advice has been offered, and it is still not clear to me if the OP has heeded the advice or not.
I am not advocating for either side.
Without compelling evidence one way or the other , or any balancing correspondence from the other party(s), no one on this forum is in a position to make a safe accurate judgement. In fact we are not judges at all.
I don't suffer fools easily, but I do like to see fair play, which is why I have made my previous comments suggesting moderation of stated positions, and to explain the forums position on naming and shaming which can have serious consequences. I urge you again to read the forum etiquette to understand the delicate line forum users need to observe.
Personal slurs or attacks are specifically against forum etiquette. I personally will not be intimidated by such postings, because. I generally find that such postings arise when the correspondent has not been able find evidence for their position.
As I have suggested previously stick to evidential facts, rather than jumping to unfounded and potentially dangerous conclusions.
I am not advocating for either side.
Without compelling evidence one way or the other , or any balancing correspondence from the other party(s), no one on this forum is in a position to make a safe accurate judgement. In fact we are not judges at all.
I don't suffer fools easily, but I do like to see fair play, which is why I have made my previous comments suggesting moderation of stated positions, and to explain the forums position on naming and shaming which can have serious consequences. I urge you again to read the forum etiquette to understand the delicate line forum users need to observe.
Personal slurs or attacks are specifically against forum etiquette. I personally will not be intimidated by such postings, because. I generally find that such postings arise when the correspondent has not been able find evidence for their position.
As I have suggested previously stick to evidential facts, rather than jumping to unfounded and potentially dangerous conclusions.