- May 7, 2012
- 8,596
- 1,818
- 30,935
DrZhivago said:That is a bit sweeping. Where I lived in North West Bristol, large areas used to belong to Quakers and in these areas there are covenants against caravans and pubs - that's why the NW Bristol suburbs are relatively "dry". WRT the pubs, I understand it was for lasting moral reasons and nothing to do with making the area attractive just when houses were being originally sold.Raywood said:A covenant is only enforceable by the party in whose favour it is drawn. This is almost always going to be the developer and not the neighbours. Once a development is complete and sold off the developer could not care less
The Quakers may be an exception if they are still keeping an eye on the area and trying to enforce the covenants. Even then the courts have the power to overturn them if they feel they are unreasonable or out of date. The major builders though simply want to keep the site as they built it so prospective purchasers of unsold houses are not put off. Many new houses in England are leasehold though and the leaseholder might take a view on this and could enforce the covenant in some cases.