nigel(which one?)
Quote "It would be pointless testing a caravan that all cars tested could tow because the "big boys" would have such an advantage that it would be almost like testing the solo vehicle."
Which is why the golf getting the TCOTY is a joke, if you want the tests to be taken seriously, you must at least give the title to the daddy.
While the golf may be the best in the weight group tested, i can accept that only if in that weight group, ALL the cars tow the same weight, otherwise again the test results are point less?
As for grouping cars to be tested by price that again is risible, many owners buy there cars used.
All the cars tow the same ratio - 85% of the kerbside weight unless there are reasons why not, i.e. too low a towing limit, or a caravan will not reach the 85%. Any that can't tow 85% are penalised accordingly.
As I said on a previous post, to me there's been nothing, and I mean nothing that would get close to the ability of the Range Rover TDV8.
Don't blame me, I don't make the rules! I also buy my cars second hand because I couldn't afford a good, large towcar otherwise, but any event like the towcar, car of the year, etc, etc, couldn't be done using second hand vehicles because there would be far too many variables, and once again it would be meaningless. I think that the way Practical Caravan/What Car/ does the event is the best way. Whatever wins, you are going to upset someone. For instance, if the Range Rover was voted Towcar of the Year, the "green" lot would be up in arms, together with buyers of other marques.
I think that the point is that for what it (and all other Class winners) is, the Golf is good. Personally, I wouldn't put it as the overall winner for a good number of reasons, which is why, incidentally it didn't win overall in the Practical caravan event. The whole thing should be taken as a guide, but I don't think anyone is suggesting that all caravanners must go out and buy a Golf, or any of the other winners for that matter.