CEDRIC34 said:
.................I will take your advice about contacting Fair Trading Standards authority...............
What proof do I need to supply so the forum will release his details so that others can be spared the financial and emotional pain?
Hello again Cedric.
Just to correct a point, I suggested you to contact Trading Standards in the sellers local authority, not the Fair Trading Standards Authority which is something entirely different if it even exists.
In the UK the legal retail trading arrangements rely on Caveat Emptor or Buyer Beware. Basically this means it is the responsibility of the buyer to ensure the goods are fit for purpose. You should inspect and ask all relevant questions before making the contract to purchase.
However dealers are also obliged to provide accurate information, such as advertisements, sales literature, and in response to any questions asked about the goods. failure to do so is a breach of Advertising Standards or Trading Standards.
The Sale of Goods Act requires sellers to supply goods according to contract, which are of merchantable quality, and fit for purpose. It also requires the goods to be free from design, manufacturing, and material defects. This applies to both new and second hand goods, BUT where goods are second hand, most reputable dealers will make it clear if there are any known issues with the item. The customer can then decide if they wish to contract to purchase or not.
A lot of UK judicial law is unwritten, but it is generally well established that a special relationship is established when a customer uses a dealer. It is expected the dealer will have relevant expert knowledge about the products they deal in, and should use that knowledge to advise customers appropriately. If they fail to do so or provide inappropriate or wrong advice they are also culpable if the product is not what the average man in the street would expect it to do. Old caravans are well known to be prone to damp issues, and most reputable dealers would or should have carried out a survey or advised the customer before purchase.
In all the above areas, if the deal is struck with a UK trader the tenants apply, regardless of where the customer is. However, the customer also has responsibilities. firstly the goods must not modified or used in any way contrary to there intended purpose, and if an issue arises the seller must have reasonable access and opportunity to remedy the situation.
Sadly the export of the goods abroad certainly presents a problem with reasonable access, and you have started repairs/modifications which will have destroyed evidence of the faults. Whilst you may have photographs of the situation, that by its self may not be enough to verify the faults. It would also help to have an independent engineers report that clearly states the nature of the faults and if they predate your purchase.
Within the UK consumer rights are there but sadly many citizens are not fully conversant with them, and don't use them as frequently as they could. Consequently some rogue traders try to use the populations general ignorance to bamboozle customers into inappropriate purchases.
As Parksy has commented, this forum is not a place to name and shame. The forum is hosted by Haymarket a commercial organisation, and their policies must be accepted. The best we can do is to keep trying to educate the public on how to protect themselves by taking measured steps when making big purchases. If the public were to fully utilise their statutory rights correctly, the rouge traders would either be brought to book or simply fail to make any sales and close.
I do think you would have had a good case, but for the reasons I gave in my last post I suspect it would be very difficult to conduct it from NZ now.