I've just been reading through the Dogs (Fouling of Land) Act 1996 CHAPTER 20 (as you do) and exceptions to the offence of not picking up after your dog are:
The person in charge of the dog has a reasonable excuse for not clearing up (being unaware of the fouling or not having the means to clean up is not an excuse)
The owner or occupier of the land has consented to the faeces being left
The person puts the faeces in a bin on the land
The person in charge of the dog has a registered visual impairment
The Dogs (Fouling of Land) Act 1996, allows authorities to designate any land in their area as poop scoop areas without any requirement to provide signs or dog waste bins.
The land must be publicly accessible and open to the air, however the following areas are not included:
Carriageways with a speed limit of more than 40 mph
Land used for agriculture or woodlands
Land which is predominantly marshland, moor or heath
Rural common land
The Litter (Animal Droppings) Order 1991 of the Environmental Protection Act (1990) places a duty on local authorities to keep the following areas clear of dog faeces;
Any public walk or pleasure ground
Any land laid out as a garden or used for the purpose of recreation
Any part of the seashore which is frequently used by large numbers of people, and managed by the person having direct control of it as a tourist resort or recreational facility
Any esplanade or promenade
Any land not forming part of the highway or, in Scotland, a public road, which is open to the air, which the public are permitted to use on foot only, and which provides access to retail premises
A trunk road picnic area
A picnic site.
I note people in charge of a dog who have a registered visual impairment are exempt. However, I have noticed over the past months, many people in mobility scooters who have a dog and allow it to foul land where the Act is in force. The people I have seen have made no attempt to pick up after their dogs.
I appreciate, it may be difficult, if not impossible for these people to pick up after their dog, but according to the Act, they are liable to prosecution, or would they be exempt from this due to them having a reasonable excuse?
What are people's opinions on this?
Lisa
The person in charge of the dog has a reasonable excuse for not clearing up (being unaware of the fouling or not having the means to clean up is not an excuse)
The owner or occupier of the land has consented to the faeces being left
The person puts the faeces in a bin on the land
The person in charge of the dog has a registered visual impairment
The Dogs (Fouling of Land) Act 1996, allows authorities to designate any land in their area as poop scoop areas without any requirement to provide signs or dog waste bins.
The land must be publicly accessible and open to the air, however the following areas are not included:
Carriageways with a speed limit of more than 40 mph
Land used for agriculture or woodlands
Land which is predominantly marshland, moor or heath
Rural common land
The Litter (Animal Droppings) Order 1991 of the Environmental Protection Act (1990) places a duty on local authorities to keep the following areas clear of dog faeces;
Any public walk or pleasure ground
Any land laid out as a garden or used for the purpose of recreation
Any part of the seashore which is frequently used by large numbers of people, and managed by the person having direct control of it as a tourist resort or recreational facility
Any esplanade or promenade
Any land not forming part of the highway or, in Scotland, a public road, which is open to the air, which the public are permitted to use on foot only, and which provides access to retail premises
A trunk road picnic area
A picnic site.
I note people in charge of a dog who have a registered visual impairment are exempt. However, I have noticed over the past months, many people in mobility scooters who have a dog and allow it to foul land where the Act is in force. The people I have seen have made no attempt to pick up after their dogs.
I appreciate, it may be difficult, if not impossible for these people to pick up after their dog, but according to the Act, they are liable to prosecution, or would they be exempt from this due to them having a reasonable excuse?
What are people's opinions on this?
Lisa