That is a personal choice by the driver, it has no relationship to the issue about where the the eye test is done or the proposal of there being only one company authorised to perform the test.That is the issue. Although prescribed will the person wear the spectacles while driving? ...
Did I mention that there is a relationship etc or have I misunderstood your post? The thread was about the proposed eye test legislation to help prevent accidents so not sue why once again you feel it necessary to point out the obvious to me.That is a personal choice by the driver, it has no relationship to the issue about where the the eye test is done or the proposal of there being only one company authorised to perform the test.
I think that all drivers and not just those over 70 should undergo eye tests prior to getting their licence as it seems some cannot even read the mph on their speedometers! Others obviously cannot see out the rear view or side mirrors!Here’s a 2017 paper that discusses requirements for eyesight tests and licence requirements throughout Europe including Turkey. By most standards UK is pretty lax, so perhaps it should be tightened up for other age groups as well as +70s.
The driving test covers an eyesight test, read the number plate ahead ! My friend who didn’t realise he had glaucoma and then even when diagnosed in quite an advanced condition could read the appropriate letters on the opticians chart. Yet as he drove the car was continually weaving as there was limited peripheral vision, so he had to use his central vision to provide the required width. This carried on even after regular hospital visits and medications as theoretically he still met the standard. Eventually his wife cracked the whip and forced the issue to a conclusion.I think that all drivers and not just those over 70 should undergo eye tests prior to getting their licence as it seems some cannot even read the mph on their speedometers! Others obviously cannot see out the rear view or side mirrors!
So he never had eye tests?Your
The driving test covers an eyesight test, read the number plate ahead ! My friend who didn’t realise he had glaucoma and then even when diagnosed in quite an advanced condition could read the appropriate letters on the opticians chart. Yet as he drove the car was continually weaving as there was limited peripheral vision, so he had to use his central vision to provide the required width. This carried on even after regular hospital visits and medications as theoretically he still met the standard. Eventually his wife cracked the whip and forced the issue to a conclusion.
I have posted on this previously; no he never had eye tests, buying specs from Woolworths et al. He only realised something was wrong when coming back from Portsmouth one night he had to keep stopping as the glare from oncoming vehicles was just too much. up until then his only sight test was reading number plates, and then self certifying. He quickly booked an eye test and quite advanced glaucoma was diagnosed. But he could still read the opticians chart at the road legal level by moving his head around. Neither optician or hospital told him to stop driving.So he never had eye tests?
The current eye tests across the country should have picked this up a long time ago. Maybe he slipped through the net?

So he was diagnosed? Not that it matters but that’s why I asked 😉. Sounds like his optician failed him?My friend who didn’t realise he had glaucoma and then even when diagnosed in quite an advanced condition could read the appropriate letters on the opticians chart.
I certainly agree with that - my wife has impaired vision due to glaucoma and uveitis and gave up driving about 15 years ago but still has vision well in excess of the DVLA standard - we discussed this with her consultant, a Professor at Birmingham University, and he agreed the DVLA standard was woefully low.Here’s a 2017 paper that discusses requirements for eyesight tests and licence requirements throughout Europe including Turkey. By most standards UK is pretty lax, so perhaps it should be tightened up for other age groups as well as +70s.
I don’t think you understand. I said he’d never had an eye test until one night driving from Portsmouth to Bath in the dark he found the oncoming glare almost impossible to deal with. He arranged a quick visit to an optician who referred him to Bath RUH. But even as his vision continued to deteriorate he could still read the letter chart at the legal level. No optician or consultant mentioned he should not drive. So I assume that has he self certified for licence renewal he stated that he met the requirements.So he was diagnosed? Not that it matters but that’s why I asked 😉. Sounds like his optician failed him?
Consultants aren't always up to speed with DVLA's medical requirements, even in their own specialisation - when I had my pacemaker fitted the Consultant wouldn't have mentioned driving and when I raised the subject he had to go away and check the requirements.I don’t think you understand. I said he’d never had an eye test until one night driving from Portsmouth to Bath in the dark he found the oncoming glare almost impossible to deal with. He arranged a quick visit to an optician who referred him to Bath RUH. But even as his vision continued to deteriorate he could still read the letter chart at the legal level. No optician or consultant mentioned he should not drive. So I assume that has he self certified for licence renewal he stated that he met the requirements.
We have a lot of trust that they prescribe the correct lenses when we visit an optician. Sadly over the years twice we have had issues and on using another optician the issue was resolved. Sadly Joe Public has no way of proving the lens were incompatible.It's not helped by many opticians describing 6/6 (20/20 in different units) as perfect eyesight - it isn't perfect just normal - some people's sight is better than 6/6.
Two issues I have had were a new set of varifocals in metal frames developed straight vertical glare reflection lines in sunlight and night driving. I had to take photos of stars through the lenses to prove my point. The glare reflections were caused by light picking up on the inside of the frame and being vertically reflected downwards. The glasses were changed for a different design at no cost. The only other issue was that when driving peripheral vision such as glancing in to the mirror was very poor. The lenses had been made incorrectly by an error in transcribing the prescription. These too were replaced at no cost with new lenses. Fortunately I always retain my previous prescription glasses so I have a spare set to get me through. I have three sets of frames all in good condition that are available for reglazing either in an emergency, or to install new prescription lenses.We have a lot of trust that they prescribe the correct lenses when we visit an optician. Sadly over the years twice we have had issues and on using another optician the issue was resolved. Sadly Joe Public has no way of proving the lens were incompatible.
Very recently although I had no issue with reading specs, I found that my driving specs appeared to be out of focus. For instance I could see the sign, but needed to be close to be able to read the sign. A visit to another optician a couple fo months later and issue resolved. The first optician was part of a chain and the second an in dependent.
My thoughts are that it's an excuse to force the older generations off the road 🤔66 posts on does anyone know the extent of the potential details , technical aspects of the proposed over 70s eye test 🤔.
Could it be a clandestine way to reduce polluting cars on the road 🤪
