I would like to know how many fellow subscribers agree with me that the 'facelift' has ruined the magazine. The layout and content are fine but why do we have to read it on awful cheap paper? I see that the editor sidestepped a mention about that in his reverie of the 'new look mag. We are the people who pay for the magazine and it's upkeep with our annual subscriptions, so why should we put up with a sub-standard product?