That’s an interesting view. I also read that those vaccinated with a Astra Zeneca might be showing better resistance to Omicron than those given Pfizer or Moderna type vaccines. This is thought to be because AZ being based on a more traditional approach “ trains” the bodies immune system to respond in more depth by initiating T cell responses, which could give far longer immunity. But of course it is still early days.Interesting as Omicron could be a life saver in a round about way and may be the answer to the pandemic? See HERE for for information
Strangely the SA scientists are probably streets ahead of any UK, USA etc scientists when it comes to viruses.Hmmm 33 patients? Hardly a statistically valid sample. Agreed it may be worth then conducting more research in a more relevant country (UK vaccination rate >80%, RSA c.25%, Uk population average age 15 years older than RSA)
Our census is probably affected by similar findings too, as if you shouldn’t be here you are not likely to submit a return.Strangely the SA scientists are probably streets ahead of any UK, USA etc scientists when it comes to viruses.
Unfortunately when it comes to many population statistics in SA they will be way out as they do not even know the population of SA due to people moving around and never registering for government aid etc.
There could be 50 million people in SA or there could be on 45 million as even a census cannot track down all the population.
The SA one was also “not peer reviewed “ Prof F I thought supported Imperial’s view. I mention him as an example of boffins relying on algorithm projections as opposed to real time findings in SA. That’s all.But the paper by Imperial College clearly states that it hasn’t been peer reviewed yet, so questioning its proven could be premature and also it wasn’t produced by Professor Ferguson. There’s still a lot of unknowns about how various variants interact with the vaccine types. It’s like squeezing twenty years of research and trials into two years.
Surely all modelling projections rely to some extent or another on algorithms however they be defined. As data is obtained it can be used to refine the algorithm such that it should become more accurate in its predictive outcomes. The SA results are clearly real world but with only 33 collected you would not class it as statistically of high confidence. But it will be very useful to inform further studies.The SA one was also “not peer reviewed “ Prof F I thought supported Imperial’s view. I mention him as an example of boffins relying on algorithm projections as opposed to real time findings in SA. That’s all.
Surely all modelling projections rely to some extent or another on algorithms however they be defined. As data is obtained it can be used to refine the algorithm such that it should become more accurate in its predictive outcomes. The SA results are clearly real world but with only 33 collected you would not class it as statistically of high confidence. But it will be very useful to inform further studies.
Prof F quoted comments only relate to the public health threat posed by Omnicron. He didn’t seem to endorse or criticise the papers findings.
A sample of only 33 is far too small on which to base world wide predictions. It needs a much broader trial to make any results statistically significant.
It is of course worthy of further research, but its far too soon to make any fact based statements about its efficacy. And certainly far too soon to ditch the more proven methods. And its entirely wrong to give those who are against the vaccination programme another unfounded reason to make life difficult for others.
They are Clive. Exactly. Mathematical predictions. I was trying to move away from that form and take heed from Buckman’s latest . Clearly there is something relevant in the SA findings even though the current numbers are small. Real time rather than algorithms but still a long way to go. A glimmer of hope maybe😉😉Surely all modelling projections rely to some extent or another on algorithms however they be defined. As data is obtained it can be used to refine the algorithm such that it should become more accurate in its predictive outcomes. The SA results are clearly real world but with only 33 collected you would not class it as statistically of high confidence. But it will be very useful to inform further studies.
I was watching the news and two ladies around 60 ish were interviewed as they attended for their first jab in Lambeth. One had just retired from a senior job at UCL and felt that since UCL were doing so much to fight covid she should do her part. Where has she been for two years? But the other feeling I get is that more people have been moved to action because they fear Omicron. Whether this is due to the publicity given to its speed of transmission or the reduced efficacy of vaccines I don’t know. But if fear motivates people so be it.
Plant of Apes comes to mind when a disease killed off dogs and cats etc. and people adopted apes to replaceThis goes some way to explain ” The Origin of the Species” 😉.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00502-4
I agree Prof there will be many more variants, just like the influenza virus. How many letters of the Greek alphabet are left😜
If zoonosis is responsible for transmission and mutation where will that leave us with our pets etc. IMO I don’t think animals will play a large part going forward but who knows.