I agree with Dustydog. Of course, I notice it more because my outfit is over 12m, the caravan is a single axle, and I’m running on a weight ratio of close to 100%.
The "tramlines" have another unwanted effect - the track width of an artic trailer's tyres is wider than a caravan's tyres' track width and there's a tendency to oscillate from one across to the other - that unwanted oscillation can itself trigger a snake or can contribute to the effects of bow waves from passing trucks/vans/coaches.The effect of the van running in the surface grooves such as the tram lines created in tarmac, where the van is "held" non aligned to the tow car, then gets suddenly pulled out because the side force is too high, can certainly result in the unit getting an initial knock sideways. That and its direct opposite where the van suddenly "finds" and locks into a tack whilst passing over it can be the disturbance needed to excite a unit's instability.
Also where a passing vehicle's bow wave, the vehicle either being passed or passing you progressively travels along your vans huge side area can cause issues. This bow wave acting on the area of the van clearly creates a deflecting side force and that because of the difference in vehicle speeds transverses along your van's side. Here one critical element is it passes the van's polar rotation centre, be that a single axle or the "centre" of the twin axle's, so the "sign" changes creating a disturbing "yaw". The relative speeds involved affecting the also very critical frequency of that initiating nudge. Even without your unit becoming unstable, its handling is inevitably being influenced while this occurs, again with the dynamic of that influence changing as the side force moves along the van's flanks.
Some of the bigger "HGV rigs" seem to have for whatever reason* done something where they affect us less than a way smaller "Luton" van conversion, which also tend to travel way faster, adding to the hassle they cause us.
* less bow wave equals less drag, less fuel needed, a massive motivating aspect of HGV design.
It's dependent on length. )ver 12 m they are limited to 60mph ( unless a lower limit applies) .Where possible, if I see them coming I move over to the left as far as possible. I am not sure at what speed they are allowed to legally travel?
Not if they exceed 12 m in length - anywhere .Coaches are allowed to do 70 mph on motorways, 60 mph on other dual carriageways and 50 mph on single carriageways - so on motorways they can legally overtake towing vehicles.
Not sure about that as travelling at about 58mph I have been over taken by coaches that have quickly disappeared into the distance. Definitely over 12m in length.It's dependent on length. )ver 12 m they are limited to 60mph ( unless a lower limit applies) .
So the same as any HGV....
Me too - however ....Not sure about that as travelling at about 58mph I have been over taken by coaches that have quickly disappeared into the distance. Definitely over 12m in length.
Buses, coaches and minibuses (more than 12 metres overall length) | 50 (80) | 60 (96) | 60 (96) |
---|
Legally their speed limit is 60 mph - but they're fitted with a 90 kph (56 mph) limiter.I thought HGVs were 56moh on motorways.
Probably related to the 90 km/h limit in some parts of the EU, where they might visit?Legally their speed limit is 60 mph - but they're fitted with a 90 kph (56 mph) limiter.
AFAIK HGVs have been able to do 60 legally on motorways for much longer than that - when the A-road limit for HGVs was raised from 40 to 50 in England and Wales, it remained at 40 in Scotland - but they trialled 50 on the A9 between Perth and Inverness which I believe is now a permanent exception.I realise now that it came into being in 2015 when the A road limit was raised from 40mph to 50mph. But at that time Scotland remained at 56 mph. Where they are now is anyone’s guess. 🤔
I seem to recall that quite long sections of the A9 were 50mph, and latterly had speed cameras and unmarked “Polis” cars in service. Made for much nicer towing.AFAIK HGVs have been able to do 60 legally on motorways for much longer than that - when the A-road limit for HGVs was raised from 40 to 50 in England and Wales, it remained at 40 in Scotland - but they trialled 50 on the A9 between Perth and Inverness which I believe is now a permanent exception.
Somewhere deep in the legislation, UK speed limits have to be in multiples of 10 on public roads - but physical limiters are usually set to the next lowest kph multiple of 10 - private roads and works sites often have speed limits ending in 5.
The Perth-Inverness part of the A9 is about 120 miles with about 90 miles of single carriageway - this is where the trial and subsequent exception are located - the speed cameras were an integral part of the trial and retained afterwards.I seem to recall that quite long sections of the A9 were 50mph, and latterly had speed cameras and unmarked “Polis” cars in service. Made for much nicer towing.
It's an aerodynamic effect know as the Bernoulli effect. You can demonstrate it at home. Take two pieces of A4 paper. Hold one in each hand, gripped between thumb and forefinger in the centre of the short edge.My thoughts are that as HGV is travelling it is creating a "buffer" zone at the front of it. This "buffer" pushes out a vehicle overtaking. The driver of the over taking vehicle feels the vehicle being "pushed" and countermands this by pushing against it using the steering wheel. A natural reflex and not really noticeable.
When they pass the "buffer" zone area created by the front of the HGV, the driver is still "pushing" against the steering wheel which then causes the over taking vehicle to feel as if it is being sucked in when in reality they are not being sucked in.
Just my thoughts and probably wrong.
I could have sworn Hutch’s lips never moved when he explained this earlier 😉It's an aerodynamic effect know as the Bernoulli effect. You can demonstrate it at home. Take two pieces of A4 paper. Hold one in each hand, gripped between thumb and forefinger in the centre of the short edge.
......this is what actually happens to a towed caravan as opposed to an aircraft wing...Where a passing vehicle's bow wave, the vehicle either being passed or passing you progressively travels along your vans huge side area can cause issues. This bow wave acting on the area of the van clearly creates a deflecting side force and that because of the difference in vehicle speeds transverses along your van's side. Here one critical element is it passes the van's polar rotation centre, be that a single axle or the "centre" of the twin axle's, so the "sign" changes creating a disturbing "yaw". The relative speeds involved affecting the also very critical frequency of that initiating nudge. Even without your unit becoming unstable, its handling is inevitably being influenced while this occurs, again with the dynamic of that influence changing as the side force moves along the van's flanks.
Some of the bigger "HGV rigs" seem to have for whatever reason* done something where they affect us less than a way smaller "Luton" van conversion, which also tend to travel way faster, adding to the hassle they cause us.
* less bow wave equals less drag, less fuel needed, a massive motivating aspect of HGV design.
But Tobes explained it nicely.I could have sworn Hutch’s lips never moved when he explained this earlier 😉