DrZhivago said:
[
I have also worked in defence, and power station, engineering and I'm used to stuff being built like ... er ... a tank. I'm not impressed with 10 years for Bill.D's mover unless he has been running it for the whole of that time :lol:
I've worked in heavy Engineering Industries most of my life. Built like a brick shithouse, or the Ark Royal were the mantra in the early days. Contemporarily it's about commercial engineering more than proper Engineering.
The downside was lack of design for maintenance where having to dismantle a whole building to get to first motion driveshaft bearings on a 3 reduction gearbox the size of an average house was a bit expensive, moreso when same gearbox was fully dismantled and a full set of bearings and seats were changed out due to a mix up with oil samples at the NCB test lab
That was the arterial run of mine coal feeding Longannet Power Station in Scotland, that for political reasons had to be kept running. and led to institutional deafness if you challenged their decisions to strip the gearbox. Still, there was massive profit on the spares and the cost of strip / rebuild.
Another industry where kit 'goes down and stays down' is in oil & gas, very expensive to recover subsea assets if they were designed by a kid on a computer game in a darkened booth
Or the worlds largest Permanent Magnet Motor that got bent when being thrown together and subsequently had no air gap between rotor and stator. The air gap should have been 7.6mm. The makers reckoned a 0.000364mm deflection on one bolt holding it to the foundation, a structure that was the largest ever single concrete pour in the UK, was the cause
Of course we are comparing Engineering to caravans, which bare no relationship to proper Engineering