I agree with the statements about overloading etc
But people like Grayson,M A D,Koni,Armstrong etc etc would not tool up and manufacture suspension aids/improvements if there was not a sale for them---they would all go bust
In the real world a manufacturer produces a car for a wide market and so towing a caravan may not be his number one priority
Not everyone can afford to just change the car when they find it sags a bit at the rear.
French cars in particular seem to give a softer more comfortable ride solso but that is not so good for towing
Don't wish to get embroiled in more pantomime
OH NO IT ISN'T exchanges but wanted to give more balance to the debate (without using spring assisters)
Hello John,
The likes of Grayson, M A D, Koni, Armstrong etc, are of course in business to make money, that is what business is primarily about, but as with many other products, these after sales markets are about pandering to a customer 'whim' rather than a necessity. If up rated dampers were a necessity because of technical failing of the original vehicle design, then the manufactures would be legally liable for selling goods unfit for purpose!
Don't forget that all new cars have to be rated by the manufacture for their towing ability during the type approval process. This set the towing limit for the design.
We do not see vast numbers of people suing dealers/manufactures so I think it is reasonable to assume that the majority of customers are basically satisfied with their vehicle as originally purchased and the manufactures specification is sound.
If someone finds it imperative to change the damper specification so they can tow, then it is likely they are actually asking the vehicle to do more than it was designed to do.