Raywood said:
An interesting thought that the Eldiss purchase was required as part of the Hymer takeover. My feeling was that the problem for the smaller companies was that the size of Swift and Bailey gave them a price advantage when buying parts and the Hymer purchase and Coachman partial sale would give them a better bargaining position.
I haven't looked at the figures, but I suspect that the Hymer group prior to purchasing Coachman was already big enough to command very similar if not bigger discounts from suppliers to those the other large UK producers could achieve.
Strategically it would benefit Coachman more than Hymer in regards supplies. I feel its unlikely a company as big as Hymer would have sold out unwillingly, so its more likely Hymer's owner was looking to retire and was looking for a buyer.
As I suggested previously such buy outs are quite a protracted process, and it would not surprise me if talks with Thor started over two years ago even before the Brexit vote. Looking at Thor's portfolio, they have been actively growing through acquisitions, and spreading their interests world wide. They will have looked at the Europe and UK, and seen both have a respectable leisure market, but the growing uncertainty over Brexit even before the referendum would make them wary about taking a direct interest in a UK business.
Thor would have been looking at Hymer and thinking they have good continental coverage, but weak in the UK, I'd also bet Thor were aware of Coachman's position and thinking good but small in the UK and weak in Europe. Two companies that are a cut above the bargain basement producers and to a large extent natural bed fellows - better and stronger together with a foothold in both EU and UK a strategic route to both markets what ever way the Brexit referendum goes.
It would be legally simpler for Hymer to buy Coachman as presently both companies reside within the EU, and then just one negotiation to purchase Hymer.
Ill repeat this is just speculation, but........PJL