Gybe said:But stupid GB law wouldn't see it that way.
i thought it was legal when not raining to tow at 80 mph in france..?otherclive said:And neither would French law see it as legal too....perhaps they are stupid also?? ( or could the caravanner be just a little bit?)
Well i never, no i didnt know that, is it something new? over the years never come across a post concerning under and over 3.5 tonnes,but then have just found out speed camera warnings on sat nav are illegal in germany now. i say now as i thought till recently they were only ban in switzerland with france banning them this year...otherclive said:Jonny G
no if you look at the French rules most UK oufits apart from small ones exceed the weight limit for the higher speed limits. As Dianne said it was a large outfit so it would be limited to 90km/hr on autoroutes and dual carriageways if the gross train mass of the vehicle was over 3.5tonnes. That is what the discusions were about some while ago re whether UK outfits should use 80 and 90 stickers.
Because that's my perogative!Prof John L said:Why do you think GB law is stupid?
I don't know what technology you are thinking about, but as yet, there's no family-sized caravan on the market with a stability threshold speed of much above 60mph. Once exceeded, an outfit would not regain stability without some form of active intervention.Gybe said:Law makers are generally out of touch or behind the technology.
Nope, it's always been the case. There has been no change in the law although it is often disregarded.JonnyG said:but then have just found out speed camera
warnings on sat nav are illegal in germany now. i say now as i thought
till recently they were only ban in switzerland with france banning them
this year...
That's a little flippant. We have enough laws in GB to worry about, driving in Europe we are on the wrong side of the road and navigating unfamiliar routes generally when on holiday trips so we have a lot to think about as well as trying to cope with different laws. It's rather discourteous to suggest that GB caravanners drive in "blissful ignorance". I find fellow Brit caravanners in Europe very respectful and sensible in the main and knowledgeable of local driving requirements. But a little aid to stay withing local laws never hurt anyone. Brit drivers, solo or towing are targeted as we're seen as a soft touch in some parts of Europe, nothing to do with knowledge of local laws.otherclive said:Amazing how many 'experienced' caravanners just drive into Europe in blissful ignorance of the countries laws, then no doubt complain that the police deliberately target Brits....no wonder!
Gybe said:Off topic.
When our own car, our second former "tow car of the year" eventually gets out of the dealers for the umteempth time we'll not be buying Chinese ;-) again.
AlKo who produce the majority of chassis, do not approve speeds over 60mph for any of their products. If a UK caravan manufacturer allows higher speeds than this is entirely his own responsibility and he would have no opportunity to pass on any claim in the event of legal action following an accident at such speeds. German type approval authorities require manufacturers fitting electronic stabilising aids, such as AlKo's ATC, to demonstrate stability up to 120km/h in order to provide an adequate safety margin for 100km/h approval.Gybe said:My understanding is that UK caravans stability and build standards have exeeded the 100kph requirements for many years and long before current chassis, stability aids and aerodyamic improvements. I understand that UK caravan manufacturers have rated their vans in the past for speeds far in excess of 60mph parially due to higher speed limits elsewhere. It would also be rather strange for any caravan or vehicle manufacturer to build to within a tight speed or stabilty safety margin.
A quote from the Dodge Viper driver who towed a factory loaned standard showrooom trim Abbey caravan to a 137mph world speed record some years ago "The caravan was remarkably stable however and it was only reaching the end of the runaway which prevented us from going even faster".
Yes, that's what I meant when I said that this is their own responsilibity. It does not have the backing of AlKo.Gybe said:UK manufacturers have approved caravans on Alko chassis for over 80mph!
True, but each outfit has a threshold speed below which it will recover from instability of its own accord without any active intervention and above which it will get completely out of control if no action is taken in the event of instability occurring. This speed varies from outfit to outfit, depending on a multitude of factors, but is generally somewhere around 60mph.Raywood said:There is no right or wrong answer to the maximum safe speed, it depends on the outfit, the loading and the weather conditions. Sixty seems to be a reasonable compromise and the time saved travelling faster than that is not great.
DianneT said:Travelling to Bury St Edmunds on the A14 at 70 mph we were overtaken by a large single axle caravan doing nearly 75 mph could not believe it. He then proceeded to keep at the same speed overtaing all the vehicles in sight how iun-safe and stupid is that?
Nigel Hutson said:Stability wise, it's usually the car that's the problem (or badly loaded caravan). I have towed standard caravans (except no stabiliser fitted, and ATC disconnected) at obscene speeds on test tracks wioth good cars, but with less good cars, I wouldn't go much above 60 mph. The caravans have all been ballasted, with measured noseweights etc, etc. There are some popular tow vehicles out there that have been surprisingly bad, but then good surprises are thrown up, like this years winner of the PC Tow Car Award, the Jaguar XF.
sat nav are not becoming illegal but camera locations warnings are illegal now in most european countries and the uk lookssmiley said:Well, it wasn't me on the A14 as I was in France on the motorways. But I will be on A14 next weekend..
I don't have an outfit that is over 3.5t so if its not raining we tow at 70-75 in France conditions permitting of course.... Our van has no trouble staying on the ground in a straight line..at home on motorways I see nothing wrong with towing at 60-65 maybe, (car are allowed to drive between 70-80 so i just make the necessary adjustments when towing) but again if conditions permits.
But I think stupid also relates to people indicating right at an island and precede to go straight on, turning left from a right hand lane and vise versa. I would like to see more fines and people getting caught for not driving properly..... speed on its own is not the only major factor of accidents so why are speeders the lowest of the lowest? Just an idle thought..
If sat nav and garmins are becomming illegall in Germany especailly, could one ask WHY are the germans building car with these items built in???
Should the government tell audi, VW not to put them in as standard fit??
I'm fascinated and would love to know how Herman, LeClerc or Pietro Plod will know if speed camera detection is enabled on a Satnav. If I wanted to use my personal satnav to detect German camera locations I could have the speed cam files on a seperate card that could swifly be removed before the Plods got near the car or satnav.JonnyG said:sat nav are not becoming illegal but camera locations warnings are illegal now in most european countries and the uk lookssmiley said:Well, it wasn't me on the A14 as I was in France on the motorways. But I will be on A14 next weekend..
I don't have an outfit that is over 3.5t so if its not raining we tow at 70-75 in France conditions permitting of course.... Our van has no trouble staying on the ground in a straight line..at home on motorways I see nothing wrong with towing at 60-65 maybe, (car are allowed to drive between 70-80 so i just make the necessary adjustments when towing) but again if conditions permits.
But I think stupid also relates to people indicating right at an island and precede to go straight on, turning left from a right hand lane and vise versa. I would like to see more fines and people getting caught for not driving properly..... speed on its own is not the only major factor of accidents so why are speeders the lowest of the lowest? Just an idle thought..
If sat nav and garmins are becomming illegall in Germany especailly, could one ask WHY are the germans building car with these items built in???
Should the government tell audi, VW not to put them in as standard fit??
likely to follow suit.. It seems a crazy idea really although those that claim one should always have an eye on ones speedo,just in case will disagree with me,but for me a warning serves a good purpose regardless the alternative is a lot of drivers will be hitting their
brakes when they see the camera and this itself will cause a problem regardless of if they are speeding or not,as plenty of drivers who are not speeding still seem to hit their brakes at the sight of a speed camera.......