Thanks RayW. for the view that the Club should be acting for me not the underwriters. Since my last posting I have expressed this very clearly to CAMC Insurance section and have requested chapter and verse of the clauses in documents I have received stating the claimed exclusions. Another thread you are contributing to at th moment concerning cover for the caravan indicates that these is considerable confusion over the status of CAMC . I have written to head of insurance CAMC requesting they look at these threads with a view to gettin them to publich the position in language which the average member can understand.
I have an ongoing situation with their underwriters as to how corvid can be act of god/force majure whereas bad weather is apparently not . Didn't know underwriters could choose, but then, clearly with lots of other fold, i don't understand much.
At time of writing 09 June both CAMC and underwrite people are working from home so perhaps I am expecting too much, . The one really good thing is that the Rep Pennant duty team continue to be right there and helpful doing thes best with situations you cans sense they understand are not satisfactory to the member but over which they have no authority.
I have an ongoing situation with their underwriters as to how corvid can be act of god/force majure whereas bad weather is apparently not . Didn't know underwriters could choose, but then, clearly with lots of other fold, i don't understand much.
At time of writing 09 June both CAMC and underwrite people are working from home so perhaps I am expecting too much, . The one really good thing is that the Rep Pennant duty team continue to be right there and helpful doing thes best with situations you cans sense they understand are not satisfactory to the member but over which they have no authority.