From my house to the town of H is 8.5 miles. The road is wide, fairly straight and 5 of the miles are rural. It is however, for reasons I have never understood quite a dangerous road judging by the number of fatal accidents in recent years. I acknowledge that something needed to be done to improve safety, but was a bit sceptical when all the previous limits were reduced by 10mph, and indeed more fatalities occurred. The latest move by the council is however taking things to ridiculous extremes. They have installed, believe it or not, 17 speed cameras on the 6 mile stretch to the town boundary, adding to the 3 that were already on the urban stretch. That's 20 cameras in 8.5 miles! My belief is that this is excessive and potentially dangerous as drivers now have to spend more time looking at the speedo than the road (the speed limit changes from 40 - 50 - 30 - 40 - 30 over this stretch. Added to this is the highly frustrating habit of 9/10 drivers driving 10mph below whichever limit, and slowing even more for the cameras. (A penalty cannot be imposed by fixed cameras at speeds less than the limit plus 10percent plus two mph - ie, 35mph in a 30mph area - though I do not claim this to be a justification for exceeding the limit).
Has this council set a new record for density of speed cameras? Is the strategy sensible?
Has this council set a new record for density of speed cameras? Is the strategy sensible?