Although this is a much debated topic, I feel the need to interject here guys ...
First of all, to dispel a myth. A caravan does not have a noseweight. There is no such thing.
When people refer to the noseweight of their caravan, they are generally referring to the vertical component of the centripetal force acting on the internal face of the TDC of the tow hitch. However, this is a dynamic force, and is a moment of force about the centre of the caravan’s axle, which will vary significantly depending on the angle of the caravan.
I’ll try to explain as best as possible, without the use of formulae or diagrams, and for the purposes of explanation, let’s ignore the [important] fact that the caravan will be in motion during your journey.
Imagine first of all, that you had loaded your caravan ready for your next trip, and it was situated on level ground, and you had used the bathroom scales method to measure the vertical component of the centripetal force on the internal face of the tow hitch [read NOSEWEIGHT] and the reading on your scales showed 90KG. Now, imagine if a giant picked up your caravan and held it between his thumb and index finger, in the centre of the each of the two wheels (assuming a single-axle van of course !) . The van’a axle would rotate until the “nose” was pointing vertically downwards. At this point, the effective “Noseweight” is zero. That’s because the vertical component of the centripetal force is zero. Now, if the giant was to place your scales on the ground and hold the van again by gripping the two wheels between his thumb and index finger so that the tow hitch was resting on top of the scales, but the angle of the van was 45 degrees, your scales would read 45KG.
That’s why there are significant discrepancies between the different methods of measuring the meaningless phrase which is often referred to as a caravan’s noseweight.
Those methods which measure the vertical component of the centripetal force when the van is level will give you the maximum reading on the scales.
The method that the Prof recommends, which involves adjusting the level of the van until it is at the same angle it would be at the moment you drive off on your holiday (as determined by the towball height when the towing vehicle is fully loaded) and then measuring the vertical component of the centripetal force will give you a lower reading, which as an instantaneous value is more accurate to begin with, but which wil gradually increase, and tend towads the horizontal value as your fuel depleats, and you start to throw the children, dogs, magazines and sweet wrappers out of the window as your journey progresses, in other words as your tow ball raises in equilibrium.
So, which is the correct method to be employed when measuring “noseweight” ? - Well, neither, because the term in itself is nonsense.
If you want to err on the side of caution and ascertain the maximum value of the vertical component of the cetntripetal force when the van is stationary, and level, then use the horizontal measuring method. If you want a more realistic value at the time you begin your journey, then use the Prof’s method.
People try to measure and adjust their “noseweight” based on their interpretation of the maximum official “load” values as stipulated by the manufacturers of the vehicle, the towball and the tow hitch, but form my experience, these are seldomly expressed as static values and of course when the outfit is bouncing along over an undulating road surface, the effective “noseweight” would be many times that measured using either of the two aforementioned methods.
Which method do I use ? ... The same method as recommended by the Prof, as I consider this to be a much more realistic value of the vertical component in a practical situation, despite the inevitable variation for the reasons already mentioned.
In any case, although it may not be a true representation of the situation when towing with any particular outfit, the maximum static value of “Noseweight” is achieved when the van is level.
Ic.