• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Alko Stabaliser

For many years I have used the Snakemaster blade type stabaliser, and have always been happy with it.

Is it worth the expense of changing to the latest Alko type? i.e. are they that much more efficient. Cost is likely to be around £220 plus new lock at a further £60 - £70.

The reason this has come about is that I am changing my car and will probably have a detachable ball, so would be more convenient to have the built in stabaliser.

Any comments much appreciated
 
In principle the integrated type stabiliser like the AlKo need not necessarily be any more efficient than a good blade type but they are so much more convenient to use.
 
Agree with Lutz, the main benefit of the AL-KO (or Winterhoff) stabiliser coupling is the convenience of use.

In terms of the stability offered, you shouldn't experience any noticeable difference - both tyres offer the same (near identical) level of resistance to fishtailing.

We have an AL-KO stabiliser coupling and use it with our detachable tow-ball, and it works as described - easy to couple up.

Robert
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Back
Top