Hello Damian,
With respect of ruprtured diaphragms let me assure it is not nonsense.
I agree that a rupture that destroys the total integrity of the diaphragm will allow gas at a significantly higher pressure through, but the small oroface area of the regulators needle valve will limit the ultimate mass gas flow. With such a catestophic failure the gas pressure in the low pressure side and pipe work is unlikely to climb to the levels you suggest becuase of the gross leak through the ruptured diaphram which is then vented to atmosphere. I am in no way claiming this is a safe or satisfactory situation.
Some symptoms came to light when a client company (I cannot name for reasons of confidentiality) were contemplating importing a regulator manuafctured in the Far East for sale in the EU.
Various test regimes were set up including those where water could collect in the area of the breather vent. It was known that under certain conditions water could gain addmitance to the atmospheric side of the regulator. These units were left on long term test, and it was noted that after some particulary frosty weather LPG could be smelt around the regulators, but the smell deminished as the as the appliance demand increased.
Investigation of the internal working found about a teaspoon full of water, and that the diaphragms had been damaged around the edge where the water had collected. The damage to the diaphram indicated it and been locally stretched and due to the form of the clamping ring and bottom casting it seemed to have cause fissure type stretch marks which proved to be penetrating These would allow varying amounts of gas to vent to atmosphere depending on the position of the diaphragm due to throughput. The fact the damage was localised to the area where the water had collected discounted general aging of the diaphragm and pointed to so relation to the water. Other tests discounted any checmical reaction with the water, which left mechanical stress induced by the expansion of freezing water
The company decided that due to this and a number of of other design and manufacturing isssues it was not possible to obtain EU approvals for the product as it stood, so it was never adopted.
However I cannot categorically say that other makes and designs will or wont suffer in exactly the same way but the possibility is there.
With respect of ruprtured diaphragms let me assure it is not nonsense.
I agree that a rupture that destroys the total integrity of the diaphragm will allow gas at a significantly higher pressure through, but the small oroface area of the regulators needle valve will limit the ultimate mass gas flow. With such a catestophic failure the gas pressure in the low pressure side and pipe work is unlikely to climb to the levels you suggest becuase of the gross leak through the ruptured diaphram which is then vented to atmosphere. I am in no way claiming this is a safe or satisfactory situation.
Some symptoms came to light when a client company (I cannot name for reasons of confidentiality) were contemplating importing a regulator manuafctured in the Far East for sale in the EU.
Various test regimes were set up including those where water could collect in the area of the breather vent. It was known that under certain conditions water could gain addmitance to the atmospheric side of the regulator. These units were left on long term test, and it was noted that after some particulary frosty weather LPG could be smelt around the regulators, but the smell deminished as the as the appliance demand increased.
Investigation of the internal working found about a teaspoon full of water, and that the diaphragms had been damaged around the edge where the water had collected. The damage to the diaphram indicated it and been locally stretched and due to the form of the clamping ring and bottom casting it seemed to have cause fissure type stretch marks which proved to be penetrating These would allow varying amounts of gas to vent to atmosphere depending on the position of the diaphragm due to throughput. The fact the damage was localised to the area where the water had collected discounted general aging of the diaphragm and pointed to so relation to the water. Other tests discounted any checmical reaction with the water, which left mechanical stress induced by the expansion of freezing water
The company decided that due to this and a number of of other design and manufacturing isssues it was not possible to obtain EU approvals for the product as it stood, so it was never adopted.
However I cannot categorically say that other makes and designs will or wont suffer in exactly the same way but the possibility is there.