"bending tool cost [roof to front] as the same extrusion could fit either side"We use it for a sun shade in France; we also use the one across the front for that as well. Using the shades makes a big difference to the comfort in the van.
Yes Bailey leaving it off the Pegasus [ probably Olympus to?] is a big omission in our view.
Don't buy the tooling cost argument for one moment as with the success of Alu-Tech sales wise they surely have sights set on a bigger market than just the UK? It's not as if it's an extrusion tooling cost its only a rail bending tool cost roof to front] as the same extrusion could fit either side; indeed they have increased cost by having the non awning one at all?
Sounds a good ideaAgreed JTQ.
I have worked in the aluminum chassis production industry and have full knowledge of stretch forming aluminium.
The tooling shouldn't be an issue as it would be fairly easy to write both a left and right handed program for the manipulation machine.
We used to form the rails to hold the roof linings in place on jags which is a far more complicated shape than a caravan profile.
I think Bailey might of dropped a clnger here.
I'm going to fit a straight rail to the back of my Abbey 540 to put the porch awning up at the back as a shed. The back panel is solid on our van.
Steve L.
I can't see how on the PegasusWe use it for a sun shade in France; we also use the one across the front for that as well. Using the shades makes a big difference to the comfort in the van.
Yes Bailey leaving it off the Pegasus [ probably Olympus to?] is a big omission in our view.
Don't buy the tooling cost argument for one moment as with the success of Alu-Tech sales wise they surely have sights set on a bigger market than just the UK? It's not as if it's an extrusion tooling cost its only a rail bending tool cost roof to front] as the same extrusion could fit either side; indeed they have increased cost by having the non awning one at all?