David_5127637 said:
Right - here is an update.
The seller gave me the wrong VIN number - the last digit was a 6 in stead of a 5. I ran the CRiS check again which confirmed him as the registered keeper, no outstanding finance and no damage repair. Next, the dealer who sold the van to him confirmed the sale which confirmed the date he advised it was acquired. The van was viewed at his registered address.
As a private sale I understand that the law has recently been changed. If you purchase in good faith after reasonable checks then a previous "owner" cannot pursue you for the item. This does not apply to a purchase from a trade dealer who is supposed to verify ownership before selling the item.
Re condition, the caravan is in pristine condition and the seller is purchasing a new handbook. The dealer who sold it to him has confirmed service history.
Hello David,
I have to say that I concur with advice given to you. If there is anything at all that does not smell of roses about the goods, the person selling the goods, the location, the price or the description, sadly the chances are there is something dodgy - walk away.
Perhaps with the revision to the serial number which is apparently confirming what you have been told by the vendor and the original supplier
you may have more confidence in the purchase - enough to convince you to proceed?
Looking at it from a slightly different perspective, if the error in the serial number had not been made in the first instance, would you have had any doubts about buying it? - probably not, and you probably would not have brought the subject up on the forum.
Now, I am intrigued by your comment about the "change in the law" If such a change had been made, as it represents a fundamental shift in one of the basic tenet of our common law of ownership and title to goods and chattels, I am pretty certain it would have been headline news on reputable advice sites such as the CAB, the Consumer Association - Which?, and the Money Saving Expert.etc. It is strange that as far as I can see from checking their web sites - no such new changes have been evident. Consequently I have to conclude there is no change to the general law on such matters - However and this is where the internet is a poor source of definitive legal information, perhaps what you refer to was a specific case, where the circumstances did not fit the general pattern, and a judicial ruling was made for the case.
The ball is now in your court.