Returning faulty Caravan

[DONNAJ]

Evening guys just after a little advice. My mother and father in law purchased a used caravan paid initial deposit in January and paid full when collecting in February. They had been away a couple of times and had holidays booked right up until sites closing for the season. Whilst away in August they lost all power. They managed to find an electrician to come out and assess the situation to which he found that the wiring had been doctored incorrectly and irresponsibly, it had melted and in turn become a fire hazard. This obviously cut all their future getaways very short. They have been in contact with the dealership and took it back and they have just thos evening emailed to say it's been fixed and they can go pick it up. They have asked for a refund as obviously they have no trust in this dealership for initially selling them the caravan which was unsafe. My mother in law is disabled and God forbid that there was a fire she wouldn't have had the speed to get out safely!
We have the report detailing what the issues were.
Is this a case for the small claims court or are we likely to be able to fight it.
Thanks in advance for any advice!

 

[otherclive]

Sorry to hear of the problems. The CRA2015 is the relevant consumer legislation. Read up about it on the Which site. Giving the dealership the chance to fix it was the right thing to do. They should not have charged you as the law allows one chance to remedy the fault, or claim a refund by rejecting the caravan. But you’ve passed that stage now as the dealership have repaired it. I assume that the dealership did not charge for the repairs. If your relatives aren’t happy keeping the caravan they could talk to the dealership about having it taken back and a cash settlement or trade in. Alternatively sell it.

Caravan electrics can be a nightmare in the way they are installed and not easy to spot changes that an owner may have introduced, and they aren’t normally checked at service. So without knowing the details the dealership May not have been aware. But they are legally responsible under CRA2015 and from your description they have fulfilled their obligations by repairing the caravan.

Which legal services give a free initial consultation and if there is a case under CRA 2015 then by paying their subscription (approx£100) there is unlimited legal advise and guidance on how to pursue a claim. But from your description it seems as if the dealership have done the right thing. If I’ve misunderstood please come back and clarify.

 

[Buckman]

To be honest I don't think the caravan can be rejected at this stage. Within the first 6 months under CRA 2015 you can request a repair or if that does not resolve the issue only then can you request a refund. You would be using S9, S10, S11 and S19 & 20.

In this case the fault was identified within the first 6 months and the dealership has rectified the issue and we can now assume everything is now working so under CRA 2015 the dealer has fulfilled their obligations.

If there is concern about the caravan, then get a report from an AWS technician on the wiring. If it is still faulty only then can you request a refund. If the dealership still rejects the request for a refund only at this point should you be contacting Which Legal Services.

We successfully rejected our caravan at 11 months by following procedures and then using advcie from Which Legal Services who are very helpful.

 

[Woodentop]

To clarify, CRA2015 allows you to return the item within 30 days. If you exceed 30 days but less than six months the fault is assumed to have been present at the time of purchase and the supplier is given ONE attempt at fixing it, thereafter you can reject it. If you exceed 6 months but less than 12 the onus is upon you to prove them the fault was present when you purchased the item before you can reject it.
One point no-one has made. You also need to read the terms of the guarantee to ensure exactly what is covered, although given yours is/was a safety issue I doubt the supplier could get out from under that easily.

 

[Buckman]

To clarify, CRA2015 allows you to return the item within 30 days. If you exceed 30 days but less than six months the fault is assumed to have been present at the time of purchase and the supplier is given ONE attempt at fixing it, thereafter you can reject it. If you exceed 6 months but less than 12 the onus is upon you to prove them the fault was present when you purchased the item before you can reject it.
One point no-one has made. You also need to read the terms of the guarantee to ensure exactly what is covered, although given yours is/was a safety issue I doubt the supplier could get out from under that easily.

The 30 days is no longer relevant in this case. Secondly CRA 2015 over rides any warranty so that is a non starter.

 

[Beardy]

Secondly CRA 2015 over rides any warranty so that is a non starter.

Not necessarily true. A warranty can offer protection over and above the CRA. The CRA allows 6 years to pursue remides for breach of statutory rights but warranties can extend beyond that, for example Kia's 7 year warranty on their cars.