The difference in these technologies is the MPPT system as that designation implies keeps the panel output voltage as near to its "maximum optimum performance voltage" as the light's power can achieve, thus potentially improving the yield, panel rating for panel rating. It's a better system in that, but it is more expensive to make and benefits more with panels also optimised for it. The suggested Morningstar PWM controller is suggested as it is a known product, from one of the world most highly respected makers, albeit their most basic model, but it works and has a very low parasitic drain, important in the required duty with a low Wattage panel. My concerns borne out from a few tests I made are that there are some poor cheapo controllers out there, the best one can say of them is limited to the wording on the label looks impressive.
Checking what drains are there, and what current a panel can provide is interesting and constructive in decision making, if not essential.
THIS little cheapo gizmo is brilliant at finding these real-life values out, it plugs into the blade fuse that should be fitted in the batteries positive feed cable, the fuse being then refitted into its probe. Then switched on or not it completes the circuit, but if switched on also measure the current flowing and indicates whether it is flowing in or out. It can live there or be usefully put in your tool bag for any automotive 12 volt powering issues that you might need to investigate.