The above is a very different item to the light weight caravan the OP had, with very much higher weight and costs to build implications.
I am not convinced claiming that an item built for a different market, one with way higher ruggedness, and where weight implications are better tolerated, helps at all in claiming that technique should have been employed here in the OP's case. A product designed to be light weight. Also, I expect a product priced to sell more expensively, because of its higher cost to build.
I would agree with the OP, their caravan's body seems lightly secured to the chassis.
However, I still feel the primary and overwhelming cause of the caravan's damage lays elsewhere than with that feature.