GD485 said:Since the Second World War we have enjoyed a period of personal transport and the change to non-polluting ( at place of use) vehicles looks as though that freedom could be at risk. Most emerging technologies start of as very expensive and overtime decrease.
In business they call it the bath tub graph. With conventional IC we have not reached the upward slope in cost that naturally occurs when the existing technology loses ground to the new.
It seems this increase in costs will come from artificial charges made by the government of the day. The motivation for this change is the environment.
Most times transition from one technology to another is due to a performance improvement although in this situation the basic function over the vehicle is being severely restricted.
Surely to make a genuine leap forward all the existing functionality of the motor vehicle needs to be embodied into the design in its replacement and be enhanced to meet the new demands.
I cannot see a possible technological candidate emerging that's able to satisfy the basic functional requirements of a present day vehicle.
Dusty stole my line of reasoning B) .
Two variables changing, first is the demographic of car users, and secondly the technology to move people. These two facets will never entirely settle to a steady state, so it makes it quite difficult to be ultra accurate about how the future of personal transport will develop. What I am pretty certain about it wont just one system, becasue that would require nationalisation of the industry, and its highly unlikely any government up to 2040 will have firstly the political will to implement such a draconian approach, the money to fund it or the majority in parliament.
I tend to agree with Dusty, electric cars are the most likely outcome.
I do hope the government will intervene and set down some common features so there will be forced compatibility to enable a person to travel across the country without finding they have an incompatible car for recharging or whatever.