Lutz said:
What evidence have you got that the traffic is, indeed, one way? You only get to be informed of what your own government is handing out, but that's only half the story.
A Scotsman moving to England would be an immigrant by your definition.
We've got over 2 million EU citizens in our country (including almost 100,000 from the UK), many of them second and third generation and many have worked here for years.
Somehow I think you're missing the point Lutz.
Firstly we don't only get informed what our government tell us. Newspapers and other organisations get this information through the Freedom of Information Act which I believe is supplied by the Office of National Statistics. Even if it was just info straight from the government I'd rather believe them than the speel that Eurocrats put out because the government has our country at heart unlike the EU.
Secondly no, a Scot wouldn't be classed as an immigrant because we are all citizens of the UK.
Thirdly I have no problem of second or third generation immigrants claiming benefits. In fact I would expect them to be by that time granted citizenship of the UK. Here is the rub though. Many of these first, second or third generations still cannot speak English so we have many schools where English isn't spoke as the first language. This stops people integrating hence in many large cities of the UK there are ghettoes with no go areas. To go even further by 2020 in 17 UK cities the indigenous population will be the minority.
I quote the following........
The
2001 UK Census recorded 266,136 German-born people, making them the fourth-largest foreign-born group after
Irish,
Indians and
Pakistanis.
.... so there you have it.
My daughter and SIL have German friends who live in Dover. They have kids the same age as our grandchildren and meet regularly. In fact they met up yesterday and went to Blenheim Palace together and had a picnic in the grounds.
Finally I don't care how you wrap it up Lutz, it cannot be right that any person from another country, EU or not, can walk straight into any other EU country and expect citizens of that country to pay taxes for handouts with the migrants having no intention of finding work and it's EU rulings that allow them to do so.
There is one exception. Anyone seeking asylum but the majority of illegal immigrants today are economic migrants seeking our benefits as is proved by these asylum seekers passing through many countries, including Germany, to reach these shores.
If there are EU countries with better benefits than the UK why don't they stop in those countries, whether they be EU migrants or illegal migrants?
As you can see, I'm not a great believer in diversity because it hasn't worked. Our government say it hasn't worked and now do many ex-ministers and MPs of the previous government who are to blame for the uncontrolled migration into the UK. At least the rest of the EU put a cap on migration with the exception of us, Eire and Sweden.