I do find it strange that it is assumed by many that the CAMC sites should offer the gold standard of facilities and service. Because of the way the CAMC operates its more likely to be reactive than leading the pack. - sitting probably in the top 25% - so better than average.
Small independent sites are likely to be fleet of foot and able to respond more quickly to market changes, so I would expect there to be some commercial sites that offer class leading facilities, but I also recognise that some non CAMC sites may also have less good facilities.
Small independent sites are likely to be fleet of foot and able to respond more quickly to market changes, so I would expect there to be some commercial sites that offer class leading facilities, but I also recognise that some non CAMC sites may also have less good facilities.