WoodlandsCamper said:
ProfJohnL said:
Woodlands have you not followed the nose weight debates?
Yes, I have followed, but still thought the question was valid, and I still do.
The devices are static measuring devices not dynamic, therefore they don't know is on the other end of the chassis.
That is true: the measuring device is dumb and will only show the force applied to it, but if the measuring device adds height to the hitch (which the Reich does) then the load applied is not the same as if the hitch were coupled directly to the car. Its the fact the of the trailers hitch is raised that alters the force generated.
I also dispute Reich's claim to have included compensation for the hitch height, as the scale of nose load variation with height is not a constant for all caravans; it's dependant on the distance from the hitch to the axle centre, the way the caravan is loaded which produces a variable Centre of Mass, how high and how far forward of the axle the CoM is and how heavy the caravan is. As virtually all of those are variables, and as there is no way of entering those details into the reich device it cannot possibly calculate the error due to the height of the device.
And it's even more complicated for Twin Axle caravans as the independent suspension of each of the axles interacts with the other which gives rise to a much more abrupt change in nose load with any change of hitch height.
The danger is; if by measuring the nose load with a raised hitch and you set it for the maximum allowed, then when the hitch is coupled directly to the car, the hitch will have a reduced height, and for an SA that will increase the applied load which will exceed the legal & safety limit for the vehicle.
The situation is even more bizarre for an TA, as the change in applied nose for the same difference in hitch height load is much greater than for an SA And depending on the specific characteristics of the trailer involved the nose load may increase or even decrease!