Green at what price?

Page 6 - Passionate about caravans & motorhome? Join our community to share that passion with a global audience!
Nov 11, 2009
22,259
7,385
50,935
Visit site
Isn't the break even point for solar panels nearly 20 years and adding the cost of solar panels onto a new build probably adds on at least another £10k onto the price. Apparently the average cos of a home in the UK is about £225k? Surely this is already pushing the price well beyond what a younger person can afford? Lastly many homes do not have south facing roofs so cannot really benefit from solar power.
According to Moneysaving expert in 2019 the average cost was £5000 for a 3.5 kw peak system compared to £6000 in 2011. I recall when the feed in tariffs ( subsidies) were first reduced there were squeals of anguish from the industry with forecasts of large job losses. In fact the reverse happened and prices dropped. Perhaps dropping the help to buy scheme which is reckoned to have increased prices by 15% could help manage houses prices a bit better.
 
Jul 18, 2017
14,188
4,220
40,935
Visit site
According to Moneysaving expert in 2019 the average cost was £5000 for a 3.5 kw peak system compared to £6000 in 2011. I recall when the feed in tariffs ( subsidies) were first reduced there were squeals of anguish from the industry with forecasts of large job losses. In fact the reverse happened and prices dropped. Perhaps dropping the help to buy scheme which is reckoned to have increased prices by 15% could help manage houses prices a bit better.
Nor being negative as we would like solar panels, but even at £5000 the breakeven point is a very long time. When selling a home I wonder if solar panels are taken into consideration unlike when trading in a caravan, they only offer you the base price and generally virtually nothing for the extras?
 
Jun 16, 2020
5,121
2,189
11,935
Visit site
I consider wall thickness to be a very poor excuse for not improving thermal insulation. I am sure there are several materials that could achieve higher insulation values without increasing wall thickness to the extent of reducing the density of new housing.

Big statement when not supported by any facts!

It would be nice to know what those materials are, they would be great in caravans. And you are far too simplistic by only considering insulation which is one small though important parts of the installation.

John
 
Nov 6, 2005
7,947
2,534
30,935
Visit site
Isn't the break even point for solar panels nearly 20 years and adding the cost of solar panels onto a new build probably adds on at least another £10k onto the price. Apparently the average cos of a home in the UK is about £225k? Surely this is already pushing the price well beyond what a younger person can afford? Lastly many homes do not have south facing roofs so cannot really benefit from solar power.
Houses with a north-south ridge still benefit from solar panels as they can be fitted both sides (at a cost) rather than just the south side with an east-west ridge - in any case the ridge could be aligned to optimise the benefit on new-build homes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JezzerB
Nov 11, 2009
22,259
7,385
50,935
Visit site
Nor being negative as we would like solar panels, but even at £5000 the breakeven point is a very long time. When selling a home I wonder if solar panels are taken into consideration unlike when trading in a caravan, they only offer you the base price and generally virtually nothing for the extras?
If you look on the internet you will see numerous articles on break even point, which as panels have gotten more efficient the BE point has reduced. Of course location, orientation etc and owner usage will affect BE point. But as things evolve houses will not only have solar panels, but battery storage too. Certainly low tech solutions such as cavity wall and loft insulation have shorter payback times but that shouldn't rule out other sensible options. When we first fitted UPVC double glazing in the early 1990s it cost around £4k for 10 windows in a 4 bed detached. Again in 2010 it was slightly cheaper in the same house, in our current house we have just paid £4.5k for 12 windows and they are larger too. Economies of scale perhaps.
 
Jan 31, 2018
1,783
850
5,935
Visit site
Isn't the break even point for solar panels nearly 20 years and adding the cost of solar panels onto a new build probably adds on at least another £10k onto the price. Apparently the average cos of a home in the UK is about £225k? Surely this is already pushing the price well beyond what a younger person can afford? Lastly many homes do not have south facing roofs so cannot really benefit from solar power.
Absolutely not, I put them in at work and they already paid for themselves, 8years.
 
May 7, 2012
8,596
1,818
30,935
Visit site
From memory I think the Daily Mail estimated the break even point at ten years or more. This is dependent on many factors including your location, the angle and direction your roof faces as well as the quality of the equipment. being near Glasgow and with a roof facing East West rather than South, it is doubtful we could recover the cost in anywhere near that period.
 
Nov 11, 2009
22,259
7,385
50,935
Visit site
From memory I think the Daily Mail estimated the break even point at ten years or more. This is dependent on many factors including your location, the angle and direction your roof faces as well as the quality of the equipment. being near Glasgow and with a roof facing East West rather than South, it is doubtful we could recover the cost in anywhere near that period.
Surely with those long, languorous, sunny Scottish summer days you would be onto winner :eek:
 
Jun 20, 2005
18,432
4,255
50,935
Visit site
I am amazed what talent we have on here. If we know the answers why don’t the boffins😵‍💫
The latest building regs for private dwelling houses have just been released.
See this if you really want to know
The problems start at HMG , then the architect, local authority interpretation of building regs, developers looking for maximum yield per square metre.builders adding their shortcut …..
Anyone remember back in the 70s, The Centre for Alternative Technology, near Aberystwyth? A totally self sufficient power ,waste disposal, thermally efficient homes. 👏👏👏
 
Nov 6, 2005
7,947
2,534
30,935
Visit site
I am amazed what talent we have on here. If we know the answers why don’t the boffins😵‍💫
.....
remember back in the 70s, The Centre for Alternative Technology, near Aberystwyth? A totally self sufficient power ,waste disposal, thermally efficient homes. 👏👏👏
Built from straw bales as I recall so "greener" than bricks which are energy-intensive is production.
 
Nov 11, 2009
22,259
7,385
50,935
Visit site
Yes I went to ACT in Machynlleth for a short course, as I was a 'disciple' of John Seymour's approach to self-sufficiency when we had small (very small) holding down on Dartmoor.
 
Jun 16, 2020
5,121
2,189
11,935
Visit site
I am amazed what talent we have on here. If we know the answers why don’t the boffins😵‍💫
The latest building regs for private dwelling houses have just been released.
See this if you really want to know
The problems start at HMG , then the architect, local authority interpretation of building regs, developers looking for maximum yield per square metre.builders adding their shortcut …..
Anyone remember back in the 70s, The Centre for Alternative Technology, near Aberystwyth? A totally self sufficient power ,waste disposal, thermally efficient homes. 👏👏👏

Similarly, Somerset College of Arts and Technology. Have, (or had). Various buildings which demonstrate many aspects of ‘green’ solutions which could be used in new build. Straw bales were just one of the solutions, once rendered inside and out they had sufficient structural stability for two story’s and even surprisingly fire resistant, (though might be problematic it’s bridging in adjoining houses).. Little or no thermal capacity though. Despite being economic and effective they have never caught on. Thickness being one of the problems.

I particularly liked the kitchen worktops and urinals made from recycled bottle tops. I last went there 20 years ago. Never seen them since.



John
 
Jun 16, 2020
5,121
2,189
11,935
Visit site
Built from straw bales as I recall so "greener" than bricks which are energy-intensive is production.

It is true that bricks are energy intensive to produce. But the industry will tell you that when the green cost is spread over their lifetime they are very competitive to alternatives. But then they are bound to defend their product.

John
 
Jun 16, 2020
5,121
2,189
11,935
Visit site
I am amazed what talent we have on here. If we know the answers why don’t the boffins😵‍💫
The latest building regs for private dwelling houses have just been released.
See this if you really want to know
The problems start at HMG , then the architect, local authority interpretation of building regs, developers looking for maximum yield per square metre.builders adding their shortcut …..
Anyone remember back in the 70s, The Centre for Alternative Technology, near Aberystwyth? A totally self sufficient power ,waste disposal, thermally efficient homes. 👏👏👏

Good find Dusyty but they are not the actually the latest version.

Consultation version – January 2021
This draft guidance accompanies the January 2021 consultation on The Future
Buildings Standard: Consultation on changes to Part L (conservation of fuel and
power) and Part F (ventilation) of the Building Regulations for non-domestic buildings
and dwellings; and overheating in new residential buildings. The Government is
primarily seeking views on the standards for work to existing dwellings, and the
structure of the draft guidance


Nevertheless, they will make interesting reading. Particularly the part about overheating. Also, not just for residential.

I 100% agree with your opinion on where the problems lie. But nevertheless we have progressed a long way from local building bylaws. Anyone remember them.

John
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dustydog
Jul 18, 2017
14,188
4,220
40,935
Visit site
From memory I think the Daily Mail estimated the break even point at ten years or more. This is dependent on many factors including your location, the angle and direction your roof faces as well as the quality of the equipment. being near Glasgow and with a roof facing East West rather than South, it is doubtful we could recover the cost in anywhere near that period.
Our home also has roof with East West orientation so solar panels are a no go for us due to the break even point being way in the future.

Built from straw bales as I recall so "greener" than bricks which are energy-intensive is production.
In South Africa they experimented with plastic bottles in the walls of budget homes. Kept homes cool in the summer and warm in the winters. Good way to recycle old plastic bottles, but as it was labour intensive, the idea was dropped.
 
Jul 23, 2021
806
735
5,135
Visit site
Our home also has roof with East West orientation so solar panels are a no go for us due to the break even point being way in the future.
Ours has east west orientation. Our install was relativly modest in terms of panels (3.12kW) split 50/50 east and west. As a result our install cost was high (as we had 2 sets of scaffolding). Ours paid back in 6.5 years. When building new homes, adding solar and a battery along with decent insulation from day one increases build and sale cost that will be repaid in way under 10 years.
 

Sam Vimes

Moderator
Sep 7, 2020
1,994
1,532
5,935
Visit site
Back to the OP. Me😜😜
Realistically on here I believe we all think about “green”. Clearly from all the answers going “green” is very cosy but at what cost to us on pensions or youngsters struggling with their high cost mortgages. The average person in the U.K. cannot in all honesty afford the cost of going Green . That’s a fact and in no way is a negative criticism of going Green. Some how us , “ yes I‘d like to be Green “ Must make it achievable to everyone, which sadly it is not foreseeable possible this year 😥.

Sad but true. I've yet to come across a piece of legislation in this respect that is going to save money or even be neutral.
 
Last edited:

Sam Vimes

Moderator
Sep 7, 2020
1,994
1,532
5,935
Visit site
Payback is obviously going to be a variable depending on a number of things. If however, we're talking of periods that could be between 10 and 20 years you have to consider that being in the twilight of our lives will we ever see the return on investment.

My father in his 90s always refused the offer of a 5 year warranty with a smile on his face to the sales person.

FWIW: We have a hot water solar panel mounted on the south facing gable end of our house. It's difficult to assess the actual payback period but I do monitor when it runs and how much our electric costs are as we only have electric hot water heating. There is a marked drop in electric consumption in the good months enough to convince me we probably got our return on investment in under 5 years - and that's in West Scotland.
 

Sam Vimes

Moderator
Sep 7, 2020
1,994
1,532
5,935
Visit site
If you want an example of payback/investment in PV panels you may find this calculator interesting.


I've just plugged in my numbers and over the 25 year lifetime they assume I would lose just over £500 at todays figures. It takes into account, installation cost, maintenance cost and loss in efficiency plus also considers the Smart Export Guarantee for excess volts.

For a west facing roof (mine).....

Estimated installation costs £5,419


Estimated lifetime maintenance costs £1,450


Potential lifetime net benefit -£523 *



If my roof faced south then.....


Estimated installation costs £5,419


Estimated lifetime maintenance costs £1,450


Potential lifetime net benefit £344
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dustydog
Jul 23, 2021
806
735
5,135
Visit site
If you want an example of payback/investment in PV panels you may find this calculator interesting.


I've just plugged in my numbers and over the 25 year lifetime they assume I would lose just over £500 at todays figures. It takes into account, installation cost, maintenance cost and loss in efficiency plus also considers the Smart Export Guarantee for excess volts.

For a west facing roof (mine).....

Estimated installation costs £5,419


Estimated lifetime maintenance costs £1,450


Potential lifetime net benefit -£523 *



If my roof faced south then.....


Estimated installation costs £5,419


Estimated lifetime maintenance costs £1,450


Potential lifetime net benefit £344
Interesting to compare that output with the actual output from my system. https://pvoutput.org/aggregate.jsp?id=8104&sid=6565&v=0&t=y


Potential lifetime CO2 saving13,996 kg
Potential lifetime fuel bill saving£4,921
Potential lifetime payments from SEG
(at 3.99 p/kWh)£814
Estimated installation costs£4,157
Estimated lifetime maintenance costs£1,450
Potential lifetime net benefit£127
Size of the system3 kWp

Energy generated by the panels2,148 kWh / year

My installation costs were much higher (8.6K vs 4.1K). So far I have paid pehaps £50 on maintainence. but I am only 9 years and 10 months in.

My average annual output is more like 2,300 kWh / year.
So far I have saved about £2,270 in electricity and gas costs, but have also received over £11k in generation and export payments.

It's absolutely not a short term investment, and indeed, I could have got a much better return on the stock market in the same time period, but it wasn't about saving or making money. It was about the estimated 25 Tonnes of CO2 that the system has saved so far.

The point is, over the lifetime of the panels in a new build house, its a no brainier to install them at build time to maximise the roof area used, minimise the install cost, and reduce the carbon footprint of the home while reducing energy bills for the occupant.
 
Nov 6, 2005
7,947
2,534
30,935
Visit site
If you want an example of payback/investment in PV panels you may find this calculator interesting.


I've just plugged in my numbers and over the 25 year lifetime they assume I would lose just over £500 at todays figures. It takes into account, installation cost, maintenance cost and loss in efficiency plus also considers the Smart Export Guarantee for excess volts.

For a west facing roof (mine).....

Estimated installation costs £5,419


Estimated lifetime maintenance costs £1,450


Potential lifetime net benefit -£523 *



If my roof faced south then.....


Estimated installation costs £5,419


Estimated lifetime maintenance costs £1,450


Potential lifetime net benefit £344
Just done the same exercise, £3526 installation cost - net benefit £664, ie £26-27 per year, just 0.75% of cost - with loss of dividend on investment of 3+% that's a significant real cost/year.
 
Jul 23, 2021
806
735
5,135
Visit site
Just done the same exercise, £3526 installation cost - net benefit £664, ie £26-27 per year, just 0.75% of cost - with loss of dividend on investment of 3+% that's a significant real cost/year.
The calculator also makes the assumption of 16p/kWh of electricity. Right now, it's 25p. 16p is probably a good price point for the medium term, but longer term, it will go up with both inflation and costs (though if wider spread adoption of renewables come in sooner rather than later, that may come down again).
What it is not clear on is how much of the electricity produced it thinks you use, other than by how much time you are at home. When we are not away in the caravan, we use 100% of the electricity we produce, if not directly, then by diversion to our emersion heater. I estimate that perhaps 25% of what we produce, heats water.
 
Jul 18, 2017
14,188
4,220
40,935
Visit site
We save all that nasty CO2 which we cannot survive without and along comes Mother Nature and pumps clouds of it into the atmosphere for all to enjoy.

We are all for reducing pollution and going green, but at what cost?
 
Jul 23, 2021
806
735
5,135
Visit site
We save all that nasty CO2 which we cannot survive without and along comes Mother Nature and pumps clouds of it into the atmosphere for all to enjoy.

We are all for reducing pollution and going green, but at what cost?
Manmade climate change as a result of CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions is neither an unproved theory, nor a myth. It's a hard scientific fact backed up by decades of research and data. Dismissing CO2 as a naturally occurring phenomenon is as sensible as dismissing the radiation pollution associated with Chernobyl or Fukushima as being as natural as radiation from deposits of Radon or Uranium. Yes CO2 is natural and absorbed by plants. but that does not change the truth that mankind IS destroying our own environment resulting in sea level rise and climate change.
 
Jul 18, 2017
14,188
4,220
40,935
Visit site
Manmade climate change as a result of CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions is neither an unproved theory, nor a myth. It's a hard scientific fact backed up by decades of research and data. Dismissing CO2 as a naturally occurring phenomenon is as sensible as dismissing the radiation pollution associated with Chernobyl or Fukushima as being as natural as radiation from deposits of Radon or Uranium. Yes CO2 is natural and absorbed by plants. but that does not change the truth that mankind IS destroying our own environment resulting in sea level rise and climate change.
I don't recall stating that man made CO2 was not an issue and neither did I say it was a myth? Please read my post again maybe it will then make sense to you?
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts