In the case of caravan manufacturers rule 4 of forum etiquette is somewhat relaxed, this is primarily a forum which deals with caravans and faults on all makes and models of caravan are often highlighted, sometimes a manufacturer can benefit from ther early identification of generic faults which come to light because of internet forums acting as a consumer focus group.
Caravan parks, caravan dealers, service engineers or workshops, component manufacturers and suppliers of various parts are a different matter however.
As I mentioned earlier, the reasoning behind rule 4 has been explained at length several times in in several threads over time but I'll go over it once again.
If we take Simon's complaint as an example:
SimonB said:
I have recently been disappointed with powrtouch. My mover is still under warranty but we have been waiting 6 weeks for a repair and have chased them with no reply. I also have a problem with the turning circle not being what it used to be but they are not interested. I used to recommend them to friends but not any more ! I wish I had gone with another make.
Let's examine the known facts from the statement quoted above -
There's no doubt that Simon has 'recently been disappointed' because he is describing how he feels to us.
He then goes on to say that he's 'been waiting 6 weeks for a repair and have chased them with no reply'. I'm sure that Simon is a very nice chap who doesn't make things up but how can we be sure? I've never met him, have you? How can we be absolutely certain that he doesn't work for a rival firm ( or caravan park, dealership, awning supplier etc in other cases)?
If he is exaggerating Haymarket Consumer Media would have published a statement that could be said to have denigrated the company concerned.
Simon then finishes by alleging that the company are 'not interested' in a further problem with the product that he tells us about.
Can he actually prove beyond doubt that his allegation about lack of interest is factually correct? If he can't then his allegation is conjectural, or not based on provable fact.
I'm not accusing Simon of telling lies or of exaggerating, I have no reason to doubt his word but I have no method available to me which would prove that what he wrote was factually correct. This wouldn't be a problem if he hadn't mentioned the name of the company concerned but as soon as he names them (against the rules of the forum) and the forum publishes the name then there is a potential for court action.
Haymarket Consumer Services have no wish to spend over £100 per hour to engage lawyers to defend any possible court action so they have introduced a rule preventing the naming of companies in connection with disputes or complaints, which every single forum member has agreed to abide by when they joined the forum.
The forum is not protecting the companies concerned it is protecting itself from allegations of defamation and libel and from the expense of preparing to defend itself in court in extreme cases.
There have been instances where caravan dealerships, caravan park owners and suppliers of goods have threatened legal action against the owners of this forum (and other caravan related internet forums) which is why forum moderators are instructed to look carefully at forum comments which outline complaints or disputes.
Where there has been a serious breach of forum etiquette or a breach of the terms and conditions for the use of this forum moderators are under instructions to take action which would prevent any possibility of defamation or libel.