We got rid of all the bottlenecks on the railways in Europe, it's true that marshalling yards were bombed rather than railway stations but more usual targets after 1943 were bridges, tunnels and even signal boxes, especially on French railways in order to inhibit troop movements.Lord Braykewynde said:I'm not disputing that those countries railways weren't targetted or extensively damaged during the war, especially the German infrastructure like marshalling yards and motive power depots, but it was nowhere obliterated and it got repaired. The lines are still there and the French got away lightly compared to the Germans due to the risk of French citizens if they bombed railway stations for example.
The French were the first to build a new high speed line which wasn't started until the 70s and I believe it came into service about 1981. It wasn't until after this that other European countries followed suit. Germany, Holland, Italy and now Spain have their own high speed rail. It isn't finished yet though as you can see from the link I posted and France are still building more lines to link up with French cities. I suppose we could save money and stay as we are and become a living museum, a bit like the Black Country museum only on a grander scaleWe have the high speed link to the continent and that's all we will need to bring the tourists to Timewarp Britain![]()
![]()
RogerL said:What good are railways that don't go where you want? They can't do anything that airlines can do. They don't go cross-country and you can't take a caravan !!!
The government should invest heavily in super broadband then business users wouldn't need to go anywhere - the railways have long since been irrelevant for leisure users.
If this country stopped being so damned London-centric and spread out across the whole country we wouldn't need high-speed anything to London.
Parksy said:I struggle to see how shaving off ten minutes or thereabouts on rail journeys between Birmingham and London will benefit the rest of the country
HS2 is nothing to do with taking caravans to Europe.Lord Braykewynde said:For your information you can now take your caravan through the tunnel on Eurostar and I haven't looked into it regarding caravans but you can use the motor rail service from Paris to the south of France.
You then say that super broadband should be invested into instead but that wont help me get from A to B for my holidays. Well at least not until super broadband is that powerful it will be able to teleport us there![]()
Parksy said:I struggle to see how shaving off ten minutes or thereabouts on rail journeys between Birmingham and London will benefit the rest of the country
Drafters of Red Flag Law said:I fail to see how this dangerous form of transport will ever catch on
Observers of the Wright Brothers said:Those two are nutters
I can accept your point that HS2 may provide easier access to the rest of Europe but be careful what you wish for!Lord Braykewynde said:Again it's the same old chestnut of saving 10 minutes. Usually others add for the select few, business men who will be able to afford it.
Forget London, it's joining up with HS1 which then links up with the continent whose rail system has been far superior to ours for years.
Parksy said:I can accept your point that HS2 may provide easier access to the rest of Europe but be careful what you wish for!
With the Eurozone facing the very real prospect of financial meltdown competition for jobs and resources is going to intensify dramatically.
Maybe some of the money earmarked for HS2 would be better spent improving rail infrastructure for those of us who live here with a portion of it used to finance a binding UK referendum on EU membership and to strengthen border controls.![]()
Willi-Wonti said:Traveling on British trains is the most expensive in Europe![]()
Gafferbill said:Did I hear the man walking down the track shout………..
TICKETS PLEASE